From: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
To: ego@in.ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked when cpu is set to offline
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:56:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204581362.3842.34.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080304090933.GA8997@in.ibm.com>
> This is the hung_task_timeout message after a couple of cpu-offlines.
>
> This is on 2.6.25-rc3.
>
> INFO: task bash:4467 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> f3701dd0 00000046 f796aac0 f796aac0 f796abf8 cc434b80 00000000 f41ee940
> 0180b046 0000026e 00000016 00000000 00000008 f796b080 f796aac0 00000002
> 7fffffff 7fffffff f3701e1c f3701df8 c04e033a f3701e1c f3701dec c0139dec
> Call Trace:
> [<c04e033a>] schedule_timeout+0x16/0x8b
> [<c0139dec>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe9/0x111
> [<c04e01c9>] wait_for_common+0xcf/0x12e
> [<c011a3f0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xd
> [<c04e02aa>] wait_for_completion+0x12/0x14
> [<c012ccbb>] flush_cpu_workqueue+0x50/0x66
> [<c012cd28>] ? wq_barrier_func+0x0/0xd
> [<c012cd14>] cleanup_workqueue_thread+0x43/0x57
> [<c04c6f87>] workqueue_cpu_callback+0x8e/0xbd
> [<c04e3975>] notifier_call_chain+0x2b/0x4a
> [<c0132e9d>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
> [<c0132eab>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0xc/0xe
> [<c013e054>] _cpu_down+0x150/0x1ec
> [<c013e133>] cpu_down+0x23/0x30
> [<c02e3897>] store_online+0x27/0x5a
> [<c02e3870>] ? store_online+0x0/0x5a
> [<c02e09d8>] sysdev_store+0x20/0x25
> [<c0196d2d>] sysfs_write_file+0xad/0xdf
> [<c0196c80>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xdf
> [<c0163da9>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x108
> [<c0164333>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> [<c01049da>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5
> =======================
> 3 locks held by bash/4467:
> #0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c0196ca5>] sysfs_write_file+0x25/0xdf
> #1: (cpu_add_remove_lock){--..}, at: [<c013e10e>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0xf/0x11
> #2: (cpu_hotplug_lock){----}, at: [<c013df5b>] _cpu_down+0x57/0x1ec
>
> So it's not just a not reaping of watchdog thread issue.
>
> I doubt it's due to some locking dependency since we have lockdep checks
> in the workqueue code before we flush the cpu_workqueue.
You may "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq" and "echo t
> /proc/sysrq-trigger", then check dmesg info, you can get
[watchdog/#]'s call stack which could give out where it is currently.
On my machine, that indicated [watchdog/1] is calling
sched_setscheduler. I doubt it is being killed before it is started and
woken up, this may result in some synchronization issues.
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 18:42 Yi Yang
2008-03-03 11:54 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 14:53 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 17:37 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 15:31 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 14:45 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-04 5:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-04 9:09 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 21:56 ` Yi Yang [this message]
2008-03-04 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-04 14:37 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-06 20:05 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-05 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-05 13:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-06 11:15 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 12:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 13:44 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 2:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-07 9:10 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 10:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 23:20 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-07 13:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-07 13:55 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 15:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 19:14 ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes aredealocked " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 20:18 ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked " Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-07 23:01 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-08 1:50 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-08 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-08 5:10 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Gregory Haskins
2008-03-08 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-08 17:50 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplugevent Gregory Haskins
2008-03-09 0:31 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-10 14:12 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-09 2:35 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 12:41 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 8:14 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 13:13 ` [PATCH] cpu-hotplug: Register update_sched_domains() notifier with higher prio Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-10 13:39 ` [PATCH] keep rd->online and cpu_online_map in sync Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 14:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 18:12 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-10 22:00 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 22:10 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-11 1:34 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-11 4:39 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204581362.3842.34.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com \
--to=yi.y.yang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome