mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>, <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	<suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>, <yi.y.yang@intel.com>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	<oleg@sign.ru>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplugevent
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:50:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D28BAC.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080308084118.GA24552@elte.hu>

>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at  3:41 AM, in message <20080308084118.GA24552@elte.hu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: 

> * Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
> 
>>    Unfortunately, this patch will introduce its own set of bugs. 
>> However, your analysis was spot-on.  I think I see the problem now.  
>> It was introduced when I put a hack in to "fix" s2ram problems in -mm 
>> as a result of the new root-domain logic.  I think the following patch 
>> will fix both issues:
>> 
>> (I verified that I could take a cpu offline/online, but I don't have 
>> an s2ram compatible machine handy.  Andrew, I believe you could 
>> reproduce the s2ram problem a few months ago when that issue popped 
>> up.  So if you could, please verify that s2ram also works with this 
>> patch applied, in addition to the hotplug problem.
> 
> thanks Gregory, i've queued up your fix. If it passes all tests over the 
> day i'll send it to Linus in about 12 hours.
> 


After thinking about it some more, I am not sure if I got this fix quite right. The first two hunks are technically fine and should ultimately go in.  The last hunk is questionable.

Ultimately, I believe the root cause of these reported issues is that cpu_online_map and rd->online can get out of sync.  I fear that while the current patch may fix the hotplug/s2ram case, it potentially breaks the disjoint cpuset topology change case.  I will run a few cpuset tests ASAP to confirm, though I may not have a chance until Monday.

What I probably need is to tie the code that sets/clears cpu_online_map to the root-domain rd->online map somehow.  However, a cursory cscope inspection has failed to reveal the location that this cpu_online_map manipulation occurs.  If anyone knows where cpu_online_map is actually updated, please let me know.  Otherwise, let me think about this some more and get back to you.

In the meantime, cpu_and'ing "task->cpus_allowed & cpu_online_map & rd->online" in the place that Suresh identified should technically fix the hotplug issue without adding more bugs, at the expense of requiring two calls to cpu_and().  The expense should be more or less negligible on mainstream kernels, but may hurt our big-iron (e.g. SGI) brethren.  Hopefully I will come up with a real fix shortly, before it becomes a real issue.

Regards,
-Greg

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-08 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-02 18:42 [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked when cpu is set to offline Yi Yang
2008-03-03 11:54 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 11:56   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:02     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 14:53       ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 17:37         ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 15:31 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 14:45   ` Yi Yang
2008-03-04  5:26     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-04  9:09       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 21:56         ` Yi Yang
2008-03-04 15:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-04 14:37         ` Yi Yang
2008-03-06 20:05           ` Yi Yang
2008-03-05 10:05         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-05 13:53           ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-06 11:15             ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 12:22               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 13:44         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07  2:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-07  9:10             ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 10:51               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 23:20                 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-07 13:02                 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-07 13:55                   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 15:50                     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 19:14                       ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes aredealocked " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 20:18                   ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked " Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 21:36                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-07 23:01                       ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 23:29                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 23:43                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-08  1:50                             ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-08  2:09                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-08  5:10                               ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Gregory Haskins
2008-03-08  8:41                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-08 17:50                                   ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2008-03-09  0:31                                     ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplugevent Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-10 14:12                                       ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-09  2:35                                 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 12:41                                   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10  8:14                                 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 13:13                                   ` [PATCH] cpu-hotplug: Register update_sched_domains() notifier with higher prio Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 22:25                                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-10 13:39                                   ` [PATCH] keep rd->online and cpu_online_map in sync Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 14:21                                     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 18:12                                     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 22:03                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-10 22:00                                         ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 22:10                                           ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 21:59                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 23:36                                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-11  1:34                                                 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-11  4:39                                                   ` Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D28BAC.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
    --to=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@sign.ru \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yi.y.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome