From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked when cpu is set to offline
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:35:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080305100509.GA9265@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080304150107.GA564@tv-sign.ru>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:01:07PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/04, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> >
> > So at times, the callback thread is blocked on kthread_stop(k) in
> > softlockup.c, while other time, it was blocked in
> > cleanup_workqueue_threads() in workqueue.c.
>
> >From another message:
> >
> > However, it remains in R< state
>
> What about cwq->thread? Was it TASK_RUNNING too?
No, it was in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state. The last thing it ever
executed was the wait_for_completion in flush_cpu_workqueue()
>
> Perhaps, for some reason the task can't get CPU after migrating from
> the now dead CPU.
>
> I can't reproduce this problem on my one cpu P4-ht, perhaps you can
> try something like the untested/uncompiled patch below?
>
> Oleg.
>
> --- include/linux/sched.h 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ include/linux/sched.h 2008-03-04 17:44:53.136738605 +0300
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* hung task detection */
> unsigned long last_switch_timestamp;
> unsigned long last_switch_count;
> + unsigned long xxx;
> #endif
> /* CPU-specific state of this task */
> struct thread_struct thread;
> --- kernel/fork.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/fork.c 2008-03-04 17:45:14.773033839 +0300
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
> #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
> p->last_switch_count = 0;
> p->last_switch_timestamp = 0;
> + p->xxx = 0;
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
> --- kernel/sched.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/sched.c 2008-03-04 17:48:42.308798646 +0300
> @@ -1291,6 +1291,7 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq,
> sched_info_queued(p);
> p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, wakeup);
> p->se.on_rq = 1;
> + p->xxx = jiffies | 1;
> }
>
> static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> @@ -3944,6 +3945,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
> preempt_enable_no_resched();
> if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
> goto need_resched;
> +
> + current->xxx = 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule);
>
> --- kernel/softlockup.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/softlockup.c 2008-03-04 17:49:05.584414763 +0300
> @@ -174,6 +174,27 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_
> touch_nmi_watchdog();
> }
>
> +static void check_running_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now)
> +{
> + if (!sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
> + return;
> +
> + if (time_before(now, t->xxx + HZ * sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
> + return;
> +
> + printk(KERN_ERR "INFO: task %s:%d can't get CPU for more than "
> + "%ld seconds.\n", t->comm, t->pid,
> + sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs);
> +
> + if (!cpus_intersects(t->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map))
> + printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpus_allowed\n");
> + if (!cpu_online(task_cpu(t)))
> + printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpu\n");
> +
> + sched_show_task(t);
> + touch_nmi_watchdog();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check whether a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE does not get woken up for
> * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out
> @@ -183,6 +204,7 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
> {
> int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
> unsigned long now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> + unsigned long jiff = jiffies;
> struct task_struct *g, *t;
>
> /*
> @@ -192,15 +214,17 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
> if ((tainted & TAINT_DIE) || did_panic)
> return;
>
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> do_each_thread(g, t) {
> if (!--max_count)
> goto unlock;
> if (t->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
> check_hung_task(t, now);
> + if (!t->xxx)
> + check_running_task(t, jiff);
> } while_each_thread(g, t);
> unlock:
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> /*
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-05 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 18:42 Yi Yang
2008-03-03 11:54 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-03 14:53 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 17:37 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-03 15:31 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 14:45 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-04 5:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-04 9:09 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-03 21:56 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-04 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-04 14:37 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-06 20:05 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-05 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2008-03-05 13:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-06 11:15 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 12:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 13:44 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 2:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-07 9:10 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 10:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-06 23:20 ` Yi Yang
2008-03-07 13:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-07 13:55 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 15:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-07 19:14 ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes aredealocked " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 20:18 ` [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked " Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-07 23:01 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-07 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-08 1:50 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-08 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-08 5:10 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Gregory Haskins
2008-03-08 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-08 17:50 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplugevent Gregory Haskins
2008-03-09 0:31 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-10 14:12 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-09 2:35 ` [PATCH] adjust root-domain->online span in response to hotplug event Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 12:41 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 8:14 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 13:13 ` [PATCH] cpu-hotplug: Register update_sched_domains() notifier with higher prio Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-10 13:39 ` [PATCH] keep rd->online and cpu_online_map in sync Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 14:21 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-03-10 18:12 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-10 22:00 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 22:10 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Gregory Haskins
2008-03-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-11 1:34 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-11 4:39 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080305100509.GA9265@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yi.y.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome