From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:43:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216424592.30348.33.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080718224922.GB4507@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 15:49 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > Thank you for cleaning this up Yinghai, but this really begs the
> > question - is having write_atomic REALLY worthwhile?
>
> And this thread is about, Maciej's cleanup patch which removed
> write_atomic completely :)
>
> Thanks to Maciej who posted this fix. It was on my todo list for
> sometime now!
Awesome! I just felt the need to use 'flaming crap' in a sentence
today, and broken APICs seemed like an easy target. Glad to know it's
gone.
Zach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-16 18:15 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 16:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 17:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 22:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-18 22:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-18 22:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-18 22:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 23:00 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-18 23:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 23:18 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-19 21:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-19 21:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-20 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-20 15:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-21 17:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-22 13:24 ` Yong Wang
2008-07-22 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 23:43 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2008-07-19 21:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 22:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-19 21:47 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216424592.30348.33.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com \
--to=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®