From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:52:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080718105259.GY6875@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0807161837080.30858@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
* Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> Use alternatives to select the workaround for the 11AP Pentium
> erratum for the affected steppings on the fly rather than build time.
> Remove the X86_GOOD_APIC configuration option and replace all the
> calls to apic_write_around() with plain apic_write(), protecting
> accesses to the ESR as appropriate due to the 3AP Pentium erratum.
> Remove apic_read_around() and all its invocations altogether as not
> needed. Remove apic_write_atomic() and all its implementing backends.
> The use of ASM_OUTPUT2() is not strictly needed for input constraints,
> but I have used it for readability's sake.
wow, impressive patch!
> I had the feeling no one else was brave enough to do it, so I went
> ahead and here it is. Verified by checking the generated assembly and
> tested with both a 32-bit and a 64-bit configuration, also with the
> 11AP "feature" forced on and verified with gdb on /proc/kcore to work
> as expected (as an 11AP machines are quite hard to get hands on these
> days). Some script complained about the use of "volatile", but
> apic_write() needs it for the same reason and is effectively a
> replacement for writel(), so I have disregarded it.
kudos for pulling this off :-)
applied to tip/x86/apic. This will interact with tip/x86/x2apic but that
topic is being worked on anyway. The interaction should be trivial.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-16 18:15 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-18 16:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 17:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 22:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-07-18 22:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-18 22:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-18 22:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 23:00 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-18 23:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-18 23:18 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-19 21:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-19 21:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-20 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-20 15:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-21 17:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-22 13:24 ` Yong Wang
2008-07-22 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 23:43 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-19 21:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 22:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-19 21:47 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080718105259.GY6875@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome