mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH -tip] x86: mm/pat.c pat_disable should be static
@ 2009-04-11  7:54 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
  2009-04-11  8:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-04-11  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, Pallipadi, Venkatesh,
	Suresh Siddha, LKML, Andrew Morton

Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
  arch/x86/mm/pat.c:34:16: warning: symbol 'pat_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index cc5e0e2..bc53d8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAT
 int __read_mostly pat_enabled = 1;
 
-void __cpuinit pat_disable(const char *reason)
+static void __cpuinit pat_disable(const char *reason)
 {
 	pat_enabled = 0;
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n", reason);
-- 
1.6.0.6




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: mm/pat.c pat_disable should be static
  2009-04-11  7:54 [PATCH -tip] x86: mm/pat.c pat_disable should be static Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-04-11  8:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2009-04-11  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, Pallipadi, Venkatesh,
	Suresh Siddha, LKML, Andrew Morton

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:24:53PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
> 
> Fixes sparse warning:
>   arch/x86/mm/pat.c:34:16: warning: symbol 'pat_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pat.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> index cc5e0e2..bc53d8d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAT
>  int __read_mostly pat_enabled = 1;
>  
> -void __cpuinit pat_disable(const char *reason)
> +static void __cpuinit pat_disable(const char *reason)
>  {
>  	pat_enabled = 0;
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n", reason);

This is fixed in a better way.
See Marcin's patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/384

If you had looked carefully at the call-sites you would have noticed that not all
of them were annotated __cpunint/__init.

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-11  8:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-11  7:54 [PATCH -tip] x86: mm/pat.c pat_disable should be static Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-11  8:05 ` Sam Ravnborg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®