From: "David Xiao" <dxiao@broadcom.com>
To: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "Ben Dooks" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
"Robin Holt" <holt@sgi.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
v4l2_linux <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to efficiently handle DMA and cache on ARMv7 ? (was "Is get_user_pages() enough to prevent pages from being swapped out ?")
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:46:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249584374.29182.20.camel@david-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908061506.23874.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 06:06 -0700, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Thursday 06 August 2009 13:46:19 Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:08:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > The second problem is to ensure cache coherency. As the userspace
> > > application will read data from the video buffers, those buffers will end
> > > up being cached in the processor's data cache. The driver does need to
> > > invalidate the cache before starting the DMA operation (userspace could
> > > in theory write to the buffers, but the data will be overwritten by DMA
> > > anyway, so there's no need to clean the cache).
> >
> > You'll need to clean the write buffers, otherwise the CPU may have data
> > queued that it has yet to write back to memory.
>
> Good points, thanks.
I thought this should have been taken care of by the CPU specific
dma_inv_range routine. However, In arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.c,
v7_dma_inv_range does not drain the write buffer; and the
v6_dma_inv_range does that in the end of all the cache maintenance
operaitons.
So this is probably something Russel can clarify.
>
> > > As the cache is of the VIPT (Virtual Index Physical Tag) type, cache
> > > invalidation can either be done globally (in which case the cache is
> > > flushed instead of being invalidated) or based on virtual addresses. In
> > > the last case the processor will need to look physical addresses up,
> > > either in the TLB or through hardware table walk.
> > >
> > > I can see three solutions to the DMA/cache problem.
> > >
> > > 1. Flushing the whole data cache right before starting the DMA transfer.
> > > There's no API for that in the ARM architecture, so a whole I+D cache is
> > > required. This is quite costly, we're talking about around 30 flushes per
> > > second, but it doesn't involve the MMU. That's the solution that I
> > > currently use.
> > >
> > > 2. Invalidating only the cache lines that store video buffer data. This
> > > requires a TLB lookup or a hardware table walk, so the userspace
> > > application MM context needs to be available (no problem there as where's
> > > flushing in userspace context) and all pages need to be mapped properly.
> > > This can be a problem as, as Hugh pointed out, pages can still be
> > > unmapped from the userspace context after get_user_pages() returns. I
> > > have experienced one oops due to a kernel paging request failure:
> >
> > If you already know the virtual addresses of the buffers, why do you need
> > a TLB lookup (or am I being dense here?)
>
> The virtual address is used to compute the cache lines index, and the physical
> address is then used when comparing the cache line tag. So the processor (or
> actually the CP15 coprocessor if I'm not wrong) does a TLB lookup to get the
> physical address during cache invalidation/flushing.
>
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> > > 44e12000 pgd = c8698000
> > > [44e12000] *pgd=8a4fd031, *pte=8cfda1cd, *ppte=00000000
> > > Internal error: Oops: 817 [#1] PREEMPT
> > > PC is at v7_dma_inv_range+0x2c/0x44
> > >
> > > Fixing this requires more investigation, and I'm not sure how to proceed
> > > to find out if the page fault is really caused by pages being unmapped
> > > from the userspace context. Help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > 3. Mark the pages as non-cacheable. Depending on how the buffers are then
> > > used by userspace, the additional cache misses might destroy any benefit
> > > I would get from not flushing the cache before DMA. I'm not sure how to
> > > mark a bunch of pages as non-cacheable though. What usually happens is
> > > that video drivers allocate DMA-coherent memory themselves, but in this
> > > case I need to deal with an arbitrary buffer allocated by userspace. If
> > > someone has any experience with this, it would be appreciated.
>
Another approach is working from a different direction: the kernel
allocates the non-cached buffer and then mmap() into user space. I have
done that in similar situation to try to achieve "zero-copy".
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 10:08 Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-06 11:46 ` Ben Dooks
2009-08-06 13:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-06 18:46 ` David Xiao [this message]
2009-08-06 19:16 ` Chetan.Loke
2009-08-06 20:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-06 22:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 5:59 ` David Xiao
2009-08-07 7:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-07 8:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 9:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-07 9:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 12:07 ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-08-07 13:15 ` Robin Holt
2009-08-07 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 20:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-07 20:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 22:25 ` David Xiao
2009-08-10 13:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-07 8:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-07 10:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-07 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-11 9:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-11 18:23 ` David Xiao
2009-08-07 7:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-25 12:53 ` Steven Walter
2009-08-25 22:02 ` David Xiao
2009-08-25 23:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-26 17:22 ` David Xiao
2009-09-01 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-01 18:08 ` David Xiao
2009-09-01 13:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-01 13:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-09-01 14:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-01 16:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-02 15:10 ` Imre Deak
2009-09-03 7:31 ` Imre Deak
2009-09-03 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-08 13:05 ` Steven Walter
2009-08-07 7:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-08-07 8:12 ` Matthieu CASTET
2009-08-07 10:13 ` How to efficiently handle DMA and cache on ARMv7 ? (was " Is " Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249584374.29182.20.camel@david-laptop \
--to=dxiao@broadcom.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®