From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
"svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:21:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251127297.7538.291.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090820134155.GZ29327@alberich.amd.com>
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:41 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> For performance reasons __cpu_power in a sched_group might be limited
> such that the group can handle only one task. To correctly calculate
> the capacity in upper domain level groups the unlimited power
> information is required. This patch stores unlimited __cpu_power
> information in sched_groups.orig_power and uses this when calculating
> __cpu_power in upper domain level groups.
OK, so this tries to fix the cpu_power wreckage?
ok, so let me try this with an example:
Suppose we have a dual-core with shared cache and SMT
0-3 MC
0-1 2-3 SMT
Then both levels fancy setting SHARED_RESOURCES and both levels end up
normalizing the cpu_power to 1, so when we unplug cpu 2, load-balancing
gets all screwy because the whole system doesn't get normalized
properly.
What you propose here is every time we muck with cpu_power we keep the
real stuff in orig_power and use that to compute the level above.
Except you don't use it in the load-balancer proper, so normalization is
still hosed.
Its a creative solution, but I'd rather see cpu_power returned to a
straight sum of actual power to normalize the inter-cpu runqueue weights
and do the placement decision using something else.
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 8 +++++++-
> kernel/sched.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c53bdd8..d230717 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -890,7 +890,13 @@ struct sched_group {
> * (see include/linux/reciprocal_div.h)
> */
> u32 reciprocal_cpu_power;
> -
> + /*
> + * Backup of original power for this group.
> + * It is used to pass correct power information to upper
> + * domain level groups in case __cpu_power is limited for
> + * performance reasons.
> + */
> + unsigned int orig_power;
> /*
> * The CPUs this group covers.
> *
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 7a0d710..464b6ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8376,6 +8376,7 @@ static void init_numa_sched_groups_power(struct sched_group *group_head)
>
> sg_inc_cpu_power(sg, sd->groups->__cpu_power);
> }
> + sg->orig_power = sg->__cpu_power;
> sg = sg->next;
> } while (sg != group_head);
> }
> @@ -8514,18 +8515,9 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
> child = sd->child;
>
> sd->groups->__cpu_power = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * For perf policy, if the groups in child domain share resources
> - * (for example cores sharing some portions of the cache hierarchy
> - * or SMT), then set this domain groups cpu_power such that each group
> - * can handle only one task, when there are other idle groups in the
> - * same sched domain.
> - */
> - if (!child || (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) &&
> - (child->flags &
> - (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)))) {
> + if (!child) {
> sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
> + sd->groups->orig_power = sd->groups->__cpu_power;
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -8534,9 +8526,29 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
> */
> group = child->groups;
> do {
> - sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, group->__cpu_power);
> + sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, group->orig_power);
> group = group->next;
> } while (group != child->groups);
> + sd->groups->orig_power = sd->groups->__cpu_power;
> +
> + /*
> + * For perf policy, if the groups in child domain share resources
> + * (for example cores sharing some portions of the cache hierarchy
> + * or SMT), then set this domain groups cpu_power such that each group
> + * can handle only one task, when there are other idle groups in the
> + * same sched domain.
> + * Note: Unmodified power information is kept in orig_power and
> + * can be used in higher domain levels to calculate
> + * and reflect the correct capacity of a sched_group.
> + * This is required for power_savings scheduling.
> + */
> + if (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) &&
> + ((child->flags &
> + (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)))) {
> + sd->groups->__cpu_power = 0;
> + sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
> + }
> +
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 13:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] sched: Fix scheduling for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU scheduling Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-21 13:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-24 8:49 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/15] sched, x86: Provide initializer for MN scheduling domain, define MN level Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/15] sched: Add cpumask to be used when building MN domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/15] sched: Define per CPU variables and cpu_to_group function for " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/15] sched: Add function to build MN sched domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/15] sched: Add support for MN domain in build_sched_groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/15] sched: Activate build of MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/15] sched: Add parameter sched_mn_power_savings to control MN domain sched policy Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:32 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-24 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 7:52 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:38 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-26 9:30 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-27 12:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-26 10:01 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when doing load balancing Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:40 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-25 8:00 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-24 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-24 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:04 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:55 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched: Detect child domain of NUMA (aka NODE) domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched: Conditionally limit __cpu_power when child sched domain has type NODE Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:19 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-27 13:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:31 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:42 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-27 15:25 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 12:03 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251127297.7538.291.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®