From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:42:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090820134245.GA29327@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090820131243.GO29327@alberich.amd.com>
The level of NODE domain's child domain is provided in s_data.numa_child_level.
Then several adaptions are required when creating the domain hierarchy.
In case NODE domain is parent of MC domain we have to:
- limit NODE domains' span in sched_domain_node_span() to not exceed
corresponding topology_core_cpumask.
- fix CPU domain span to cover entire cpu_map
- fix CPU domain sched groups to cover entire physical groups instead of
covering a node (a node sched_group might be a proper subset of a CPU
sched_group).
- use correct child domain in init_numa_sched_groups_power() when
calculating sched_group.__cpu_power in NODE domain
- calculate group_power of NODE domain after its child domain
Note: As I have no idea when the ALLNODES domain is required
I assumed that an ALLNODES domain exists only if NODE domain
is parent of CPU domain.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 464b6ba..b03701d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8161,7 +8161,8 @@ static int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_nodes)
* should be one that prevents unnecessary balancing, but also spreads tasks
* out optimally.
*/
-static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span)
+static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span,
+ enum sched_domain_level child_level)
{
nodemask_t used_nodes;
int i;
@@ -8177,6 +8178,10 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span)
cpumask_or(span, span, cpumask_of_node(next_node));
}
+
+ if (child_level == SD_LV_MC)
+ cpumask_and(span, span, topology_core_cpumask(
+ cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(node))));
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
@@ -8201,6 +8206,7 @@ struct static_sched_domain {
};
struct s_data {
+ enum sched_domain_level numa_child_level;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
int sd_allnodes;
cpumask_var_t domainspan;
@@ -8354,7 +8360,8 @@ static int cpu_to_allnodes_group(int cpu, const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
return group;
}
-static void init_numa_sched_groups_power(struct sched_group *group_head)
+static void init_numa_sched_groups_power(struct sched_group *group_head,
+ enum sched_domain_level child_level)
{
struct sched_group *sg = group_head;
int j;
@@ -8365,7 +8372,11 @@ static void init_numa_sched_groups_power(struct sched_group *group_head)
for_each_cpu(j, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
struct sched_domain *sd;
- sd = &per_cpu(phys_domains, j).sd;
+ if (child_level == SD_LV_CPU)
+ sd = &per_cpu(phys_domains, j).sd;
+ else /* SD_LV_MC */
+ sd = &per_cpu(core_domains, j).sd;
+
if (j != group_first_cpu(sd->groups)) {
/*
* Only add "power" once for each
@@ -8394,7 +8405,7 @@ static int build_numa_sched_groups(struct s_data *d,
goto out;
}
- sched_domain_node_span(num, d->domainspan);
+ sched_domain_node_span(num, d->domainspan, d->numa_child_level);
cpumask_and(d->domainspan, d->domainspan, cpu_map);
sg = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_group) + cpumask_size(),
@@ -8699,15 +8710,15 @@ static enum s_alloc __visit_domain_allocation_hell(struct s_data *d,
}
static struct sched_domain *__build_numa_sched_domains(struct s_data *d,
- const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *attr, int i)
+ const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *attr,
+ struct sched_domain *parent, int i)
{
- struct sched_domain *sd = NULL;
+ struct sched_domain *sd = parent;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- struct sched_domain *parent;
-
d->sd_allnodes = 0;
- if (cpumask_weight(cpu_map) >
- SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN * cpumask_weight(d->nodemask)) {
+ if ((cpumask_weight(cpu_map) >
+ SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN * cpumask_weight(d->nodemask)) &&
+ (d->numa_child_level == SD_LV_CPU)) {
sd = &per_cpu(allnodes_domains, i).sd;
SD_INIT(sd, ALLNODES);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
@@ -8720,7 +8731,8 @@ static struct sched_domain *__build_numa_sched_domains(struct s_data *d,
sd = &per_cpu(node_domains, i).sd;
SD_INIT(sd, NODE);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
- sched_domain_node_span(cpu_to_node(i), sched_domain_span(sd));
+ sched_domain_node_span(cpu_to_node(i), sched_domain_span(sd),
+ d->numa_child_level);
sd->parent = parent;
if (parent)
parent->child = sd;
@@ -8737,10 +8749,12 @@ static struct sched_domain *__build_cpu_sched_domain(struct s_data *d,
sd = &per_cpu(phys_domains, i).sd;
SD_INIT(sd, CPU);
set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
- cpumask_copy(sched_domain_span(sd), d->nodemask);
sd->parent = parent;
- if (parent)
+ if (parent) {
+ cpumask_copy(sched_domain_span(sd), d->nodemask);
parent->child = sd;
+ } else
+ cpumask_copy(sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_map);
cpu_to_phys_group(i, cpu_map, &sd->groups, d->tmpmask);
return sd;
}
@@ -8831,11 +8845,18 @@ static void build_sched_groups(struct s_data *d, enum sched_domain_level l,
break;
#endif
case SD_LV_CPU: /* set up physical groups */
- cpumask_and(d->nodemask, cpumask_of_node(cpu), cpu_map);
- if (!cpumask_empty(d->nodemask))
- init_sched_build_groups(d->nodemask, cpu_map,
- &cpu_to_phys_group,
- d->send_covered, d->tmpmask);
+ if (d->numa_child_level == SD_LV_MC) {
+ init_sched_build_groups(cpu_map, cpu_map,
+ &cpu_to_phys_group,
+ d->send_covered, d->tmpmask);
+ } else {
+ cpumask_and(d->nodemask, cpumask_of_node(cpu), cpu_map);
+ if (!cpumask_empty(d->nodemask))
+ init_sched_build_groups(d->nodemask, cpu_map,
+ &cpu_to_phys_group,
+ d->send_covered,
+ d->tmpmask);
+ }
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
case SD_LV_ALLNODES:
@@ -8859,9 +8880,8 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
struct s_data d;
struct sched_domain *sd;
int i;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- d.sd_allnodes = 0;
-#endif
+
+ d.numa_child_level = SD_LV_NONE;
alloc_state = __visit_domain_allocation_hell(&d, cpu_map);
if (alloc_state != sa_rootdomain)
@@ -8875,9 +8895,18 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
cpumask_and(d.nodemask, cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(i)),
cpu_map);
- sd = __build_numa_sched_domains(&d, cpu_map, attr, i);
- sd = __build_cpu_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
- sd = __build_mn_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
+ if (d.numa_child_level == SD_LV_CPU) {
+ sd = __build_numa_sched_domains(&d, cpu_map, attr,
+ NULL, i);
+ sd = __build_cpu_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
+ sd = __build_mn_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
+ } else {
+ sd = __build_cpu_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr,
+ NULL, i);
+ sd = __build_mn_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
+ sd = __build_numa_sched_domains(&d, cpu_map, attr,
+ sd, i);
+ }
sd = __build_mc_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
sd = __build_smt_sched_domain(&d, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
}
@@ -8915,6 +8944,15 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
init_sched_groups_power(i, sd);
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ if (d.numa_child_level == SD_LV_MC)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
+ init_numa_sched_groups_power(d.sched_group_nodes[i],
+ d.numa_child_level);
+#endif
+
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MN
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
sd = &per_cpu(cpu_node_domains, i).sd;
@@ -8928,15 +8966,17 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
- init_numa_sched_groups_power(d.sched_group_nodes[i]);
-
- if (d.sd_allnodes) {
- struct sched_group *sg;
-
- cpu_to_allnodes_group(cpumask_first(cpu_map), cpu_map, &sg,
- d.tmpmask);
- init_numa_sched_groups_power(sg);
+ if (d.numa_child_level == SD_LV_CPU) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
+ init_numa_sched_groups_power(d.sched_group_nodes[i],
+ d.numa_child_level);
+
+ if (d.sd_allnodes) {
+ struct sched_group *sg;
+ cpu_to_allnodes_group(cpumask_first(cpu_map),
+ cpu_map, &sg, d.tmpmask);
+ init_numa_sched_groups_power(sg, d.numa_child_level);
+ }
}
#endif
--
1.6.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 13:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] sched: Fix scheduling for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU scheduling Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-21 13:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-24 8:49 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/15] sched, x86: Provide initializer for MN scheduling domain, define MN level Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/15] sched: Add cpumask to be used when building MN domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/15] sched: Define per CPU variables and cpu_to_group function for " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/15] sched: Add function to build MN sched domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/15] sched: Add support for MN domain in build_sched_groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/15] sched: Activate build of MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/15] sched: Add parameter sched_mn_power_savings to control MN domain sched policy Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:32 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-24 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 7:52 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 6:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:38 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-26 9:30 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-27 12:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-26 10:01 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when doing load balancing Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:40 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-25 8:00 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-24 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:04 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:42 ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-24 15:32 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:55 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched: Detect child domain of NUMA (aka NODE) domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched: Conditionally limit __cpu_power when child sched domain has type NODE Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 9:19 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:13 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-27 13:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:31 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:42 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-27 15:25 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 12:03 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090820134245.GA29327@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome