mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Leaks in trace reported by kmemleak
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:00:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255953605.31096.26.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4e36d110910190215j129e61ey5e20634a4bc19292@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 11:15 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2009/10/16 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:07 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >> So I've tested this modified version and it gives much better result
> >> with respect to amount of leaked objects
> >
> > BTW, I created this tree with kmemleak patches to be pushed upstream:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/kmemleak.git
> >
> > It would be easier to test.
> 
> Yes this branch worked well - and there were no leaks  from i915 or
> kvm modules for trace.
> 
> What is however interesting is the false positive leak for
> dma_debug_init(). Which is sometimes listed and sometimes not - the
> memory is allocated just once in the code during boot, so it's strange
> that pointers to that area are sometimes out of kmemleak scan.

I updated the tree above with another patch which lists where an object
is referred from. So when you get a leak reported and it later
disappears, you can use:

echo dump=0x... > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak

and in syslog you can find information about the previously reported
object and where it is referred from (if it is no longer reported as a
leak). I'm not sure whether this option would be useful for anything
other than debugging kmemleak. I still aim on getting to near 0 false
positives.

Anyway, trying this new patch on the debug_objects, when no longer
reported they are referred from obj_hash. My opinion is that they were
moved to obj_hash during the kmemleak scanning but after kmemleak
finished scanning the data section, hence they couldn't be found.

I hoped that not reporting object allocated within the last 5s would
avoid such problems but there are places like debug_objects for which it
doesn't work as the objects were reported earlier.

A workaround I had in the past was to not report an object unless it was
found as a leak in two consecutive scans. I should probably reinstate
this feature (could be optimised to use a second prio_tree containing
only objects found as leaks).

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-19 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15  8:59 Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-15  9:46 ` Li Zefan
2009-10-15 11:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-16  7:45     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-16 10:57       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-16 13:32         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-16 14:11           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-16 14:28             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-16 15:07               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-16 15:31                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-16 16:41                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-19  9:15                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-19 12:00                     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-10-19 13:20                       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-20  9:58                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-10-20 17:03                           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-22 13:09                           ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1255953605.31096.26.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®