mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	peterz@infradead.org, awalls@radix.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 19/40] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:57:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263776272-382-20-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263776272-382-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

A work is linked to the next one by having WORK_STRUCT_LINKED bit set
and these links can be chained.  When a linked work is dispatched to a
worker, all linked works are dispatched to the worker's newly added
->scheduled queue and processed back-to-back.

Currently, as there's only single worker per cwq, having linked works
doesn't make any visible behavior difference.  This change is to
prepare for multiple shared workers per cpu.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    2 +
 kernel/workqueue.c        |  152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 316cc48..a6650f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@ typedef void (*work_func_t)(struct work_struct *work);
 enum {
 	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT	= 0,	/* work item is pending execution */
 	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT	= 1,	/* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+	WORK_STRUCT_LINKED_BIT	= 2,	/* next work is linked to this one */
 
 	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
 	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT,
+	WORK_STRUCT_LINKED	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_LINKED_BIT,
 
 	WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT	= 3,	/* color for workqueue flushing */
 	WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_BITS	= 4,
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 17d270b..2ac1624 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct;
 
 struct worker {
 	struct work_struct	*current_work;	/* L: work being processed */
+	struct list_head	scheduled;	/* L: scheduled works */
 	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;	/* I: the associated cwq */
 	int			id;		/* I: worker id */
@@ -438,6 +439,8 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
 	struct worker *worker;
 
 	worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (worker)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled);
 	return worker;
 }
 
@@ -523,6 +526,7 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 
 	/* sanity check frenzy */
 	BUG_ON(worker->current_work);
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
 
 	kthread_stop(worker->task);
 	kfree(worker);
@@ -533,6 +537,48 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 }
 
 /**
+ * move_linked_works - move linked works to a list
+ * @work: start of series of works to be scheduled
+ * @head: target list to append @work to
+ * @nextp: out paramter for nested worklist walking
+ *
+ * Schedule linked works starting from @work to @head.  Work series to
+ * be scheduled starts at @work and includes any consecutive work with
+ * WORK_STRUCT_LINKED set in its predecessor.
+ *
+ * If @nextp is not NULL, it's updated to point to the next work of
+ * the last scheduled work.  This allows move_linked_works() to be
+ * nested inside outer list_for_each_entry_safe().
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock).
+ */
+static void move_linked_works(struct work_struct *work, struct list_head *head,
+			      struct work_struct **nextp)
+{
+	struct work_struct *n;
+
+	/*
+	 * Linked worklist will always end before the end of the list,
+	 * use NULL for list head.
+	 */
+	work = list_entry(work->entry.prev, struct work_struct, entry);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(work, n, NULL, entry) {
+		list_move_tail(&work->entry, head);
+		if (!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))
+			break;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we're already inside safe list traversal and have moved
+	 * multiple works to the scheduled queue, the next position
+	 * needs to be updated.
+	 */
+	if (nextp)
+		*nextp = n;
+}
+
+/**
  * cwq_dec_nr_in_flight - decrement cwq's nr_in_flight
  * @cwq: cwq of interest
  * @color: color of work which left the queue
@@ -632,17 +678,25 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 	cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(cwq, work_color);
 }
 
-static void run_workqueue(struct worker *worker)
+/**
+ * process_scheduled_works - process scheduled works
+ * @worker: self
+ *
+ * Process all scheduled works.  Please note that the scheduled list
+ * may change while processing a work, so this function repeatedly
+ * fetches a work from the top and executes it.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock) which may be released and regrabbed
+ * multiple times.
+ */
+static void process_scheduled_works(struct worker *worker)
 {
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
-		struct work_struct *work = list_entry(cwq->worklist.next,
+	while (!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)) {
+		struct work_struct *work = list_first_entry(&worker->scheduled,
 						struct work_struct, entry);
 		process_one_work(worker, work);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -673,7 +727,27 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 		if (kthread_should_stop())
 			break;
 
-		run_workqueue(worker);
+		spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+		while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
+			struct work_struct *work =
+				list_first_entry(&cwq->worklist,
+						 struct work_struct, entry);
+
+			if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) &
+				     WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
+				/* optimization path, not strictly necessary */
+				process_one_work(worker, work);
+				if (unlikely(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)))
+					process_scheduled_works(worker);
+			} else {
+				move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled,
+						  NULL);
+				process_scheduled_works(worker);
+			}
+		}
+
+		spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -694,16 +768,33 @@ static void wq_barrier_func(struct work_struct *work)
  * insert_wq_barrier - insert a barrier work
  * @cwq: cwq to insert barrier into
  * @barr: wq_barrier to insert
- * @head: insertion point
+ * @target: target work to attach @barr to
+ * @worker: worker currently executing @target, NULL if @target is not executing
  *
- * Insert barrier @barr into @cwq before @head.
+ * @barr is linked to @target such that @barr is completed only after
+ * @target finishes execution.  Please note that the ordering
+ * guarantee is observed only with respect to @target and on the local
+ * cpu.
+ *
+ * Currently, a queued barrier can't be canceled.  This is because
+ * try_to_grab_pending() can't determine whether the work to be
+ * grabbed is at the head of the queue and thus can't clear LINKED
+ * flag of the previous work while there must be a valid next work
+ * after a work with LINKED flag set.
+ *
+ * Note that when @worker is non-NULL, @target may be modified
+ * underneath us, so we can't reliably determine cwq from @target.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock).
  */
 static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
-			struct wq_barrier *barr, struct list_head *head)
+			      struct wq_barrier *barr,
+			      struct work_struct *target, struct worker *worker)
 {
+	struct list_head *head;
+	unsigned int linked = 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * debugobject calls are safe here even with cwq->lock locked
 	 * as we know for sure that this will not trigger any of the
@@ -714,8 +805,24 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
 	init_completion(&barr->done);
 
+	/*
+	 * If @target is currently being executed, schedule the
+	 * barrier to the worker; otherwise, put it after @target.
+	 */
+	if (worker)
+		head = worker->scheduled.next;
+	else {
+		unsigned long *bits = work_data_bits(target);
+
+		head = target->entry.next;
+		/* there can already be other linked works, inherit and set */
+		linked = *bits & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED;
+		*bits |= WORK_STRUCT_LINKED;
+	}
+
 	debug_work_activate(&barr->work);
-	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, head, work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR));
+	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, head,
+		    work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR) | linked);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -948,8 +1055,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_workqueue);
  */
 int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+	struct worker *worker = NULL;
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
-	struct list_head *prev;
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
 
 	might_sleep();
@@ -969,14 +1076,14 @@ int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		smp_rmb();
 		if (unlikely(cwq != get_wq_data(work)))
 			goto already_gone;
-		prev = &work->entry;
 	} else {
-		if (!cwq->worker || cwq->worker->current_work != work)
+		if (cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)
+			worker = cwq->worker;
+		if (!worker)
 			goto already_gone;
-		prev = &cwq->worklist;
 	}
-	insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, prev->next);
 
+	insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, work, worker);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 	wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
 	destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
@@ -1033,16 +1140,19 @@ static void wait_on_cpu_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 				struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
-	int running = 0;
+	struct worker *worker;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+	worker = NULL;
 	if (unlikely(cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)) {
-		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, cwq->worklist.next);
-		running = 1;
+		worker = cwq->worker;
+		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, work, worker);
 	}
+
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(running)) {
+	if (unlikely(worker)) {
 		wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
 		destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
 	}
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-18  0:57 [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 01/40] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:26     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 02/40] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 03/40] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 04/40] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:22     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:35             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  9:00                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-24  8:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 05/40] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 06/40] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:31     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:04         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:28           ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:47               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 07/40] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 08/40] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 09/40] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 10/40] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 11/40] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 12/40] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 13/40] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 14/40] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 15/40] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 16/40] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 17/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 18/40] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 20/40] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 21/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 22/40] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 23/40] workqueue: implement worker states Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 24/40] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 25/40] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 26/40] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 27/40] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 28/40] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 29/40] workqueue: add system_wq and system_single_wq Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 30/40] workqueue: implement work_busy() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  2:52   ` Andy Walls
2010-01-18  5:41     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 31/40] libata: take advantage of cmwq and remove concurrency limitations Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:48   ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-19  0:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  6:01   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-18  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  0:57         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  0:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  7:56             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 14:37               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  0:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:31                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  2:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  6:03                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  8:24                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 10:59                           ` [PATCH] async: use workqueue for worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 33/40] async: convert async users to use the new implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 34/40] async: kill original implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 36/40] fscache: convert operation " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 37/40] fscache: drop references to slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 38/40] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 12:20   ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  0:15     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:56       ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  1:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:14           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:45             ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-24 12:13                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-25 15:25                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 39/40] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:45   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-18 11:24     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:07       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-19  1:00         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 40/40] slow-work: kill it Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  1:03 ` perf-wq.c used to generate synthetic workload Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 16:13 ` [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Stefan Richter
2010-02-12 18:03 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work David Howells
2010-02-13  5:43   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-15 15:04   ` David Howells
2010-02-16  3:40     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16  3:59       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16 18:05     ` David Howells
2010-02-16 23:50       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-18 11:50       ` David Howells
2010-02-18 12:33         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263776272-382-20-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome