mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	peterz@infradead.org, awalls@radix.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	andi@firstfloor.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:08:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B566590.5030804@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B564ECC.9080707@linux.intel.com>

Hello,

On 01/20/2010 09:31 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 1/19/2010 16:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, you can flush individual works from other works and wqs from
>> works running from different wqs.  What's not allowed is flushing the
>> wq a work is running on from the work.  Let's say if the flush code
>> can be modified to do so, would that change your opinion?
> 
> once you get "run in parallel, but have an API to wait on everyone
> who was scheduled before me"...  ... that'd be fine ;)

Cool, I'll give a shot at it then.  I think it would be better to
adapt the existing interface to the new uses if at all possible.

> but then you pretty much HAVE the cookie API, even if you don't have
> an actual cookie.  (just the cookie was an easy way to determine the
> "before me")

Yeap, but then again, whatever we do, all those synchronization
interfaces can be mapped onto each other eventually.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-20  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-18  0:57 [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 01/40] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:26     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 02/40] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 03/40] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 04/40] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:22     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:35             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  9:00                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-24  8:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 05/40] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 06/40] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:31     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:04         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:28           ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:47               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 07/40] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 08/40] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 09/40] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 10/40] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 11/40] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 12/40] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 13/40] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 14/40] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 15/40] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 16/40] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 17/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 18/40] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 19/40] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 20/40] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 21/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 22/40] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 23/40] workqueue: implement worker states Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 24/40] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 25/40] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 26/40] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 27/40] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 28/40] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 29/40] workqueue: add system_wq and system_single_wq Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 30/40] workqueue: implement work_busy() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  2:52   ` Andy Walls
2010-01-18  5:41     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 31/40] libata: take advantage of cmwq and remove concurrency limitations Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:48   ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-19  0:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  6:01   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-18  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  0:57         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  0:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  7:56             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 14:37               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  0:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:31                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  2:08                     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-01-20  6:03                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  8:24                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 10:59                           ` [PATCH] async: use workqueue for worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 33/40] async: convert async users to use the new implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 34/40] async: kill original implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 36/40] fscache: convert operation " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 37/40] fscache: drop references to slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 38/40] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 12:20   ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  0:15     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:56       ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  1:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:14           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:45             ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-24 12:13                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-25 15:25                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 39/40] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:45   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-18 11:24     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:07       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-19  1:00         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 40/40] slow-work: kill it Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  1:03 ` perf-wq.c used to generate synthetic workload Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 16:13 ` [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Stefan Richter
2010-02-12 18:03 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work David Howells
2010-02-13  5:43   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-15 15:04   ` David Howells
2010-02-16  3:40     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16  3:59       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16 18:05     ` David Howells
2010-02-16 23:50       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-18 11:50       ` David Howells
2010-02-18 12:33         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B566590.5030804@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome