From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
davem@davemloft.net, perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net,
eranian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:20:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263824452.4283.566.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd4cb8901001180612g29369150h9db09470fa6000af@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 15:12 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> > Then there's still the question of having events of multiple hw pmus in
> > a single group, I'd be perfectly fine with saying that's not allowed,
> > what to others think?
> >
> I have seen requests for measuring both core and uncore PMU events
> together for instance. It all depends on how uncore PMU will be managed.
OK, hard to correlate those two though, it would basically mean only
running that one task on the socket.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 8:58 Stephane Eranian
2010-01-18 13:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 14:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-18 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-01-18 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 14:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 16:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 16:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 17:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 20:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19 15:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-19 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-27 17:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-19 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-21 10:08 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21 10:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21 10:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 10:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-21 11:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 12:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 16:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-21 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21 10:43 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21 14:06 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-21 13:55 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: x86: Add support for the ANY bit tip-bot for Stephane Eranian
2010-01-29 9:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Improve x86 event scheduling tip-bot for Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1263824452.4283.566.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®