From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is undefined
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:12:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270505579.1477.584.camel@groeck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBA51F3.7070808@zytor.com>
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:11 -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 02:04 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Would you accept a minimized patch like this ?
> >
> > /* Direct interface for emergencies */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
> > static struct console *early_console = &early_vga_console;
> > +#else
> > +static struct console *early_console = &early_serial_console;
> > +#endif
> > static int __initdata early_console_initialized;
> >
> > This would prevent the problem while minimizing changes, and at the same
> > time permit early messages to be written to the serial console.
> >
>
> I'm unhappy about it, because *those early messages shouldn't exist in
> the first place*. It seems to be an indication that we're invoking
> setup_early_printk() too late. The whole playing around with max_xpos
> and max_ypos instead of using boot_params.screen_info directly is
> particularly bleacherous.
>
> I would at least like to see if the improper invocation of
> early_printk() can be avoided.
>
There are several such invocations.
1) arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:
ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
...
leaq early_idt_msg(%rip),%rdi
call early_printk
This displays "PANIC: early exception %02lx rip %lx:%lx error %lx cr2 %
lx\n" and subsequently calls dump_stack. The handler is initialized from
x86_64_start_kernel().
2) arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:x86_64_start_kernel():
if (console_loglevel == 10)
early_printk("Kernel alive\n");
3) init/main.c: start_kernel()
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s", linux_banner);
and
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Kernel command line: %s\n", boot_command_line);
4) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:setup_arch()
Several.
After that I gave up looking.
Not sure if or how those can be avoided.
Moving setup_early_printk() into x86_64_start_kernel() might be an
option, but that would require much more significant changes.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 14:41 Guenter Roeck
2010-03-31 15:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-05 18:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-05 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-05 20:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-05 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-05 21:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-05 21:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-05 21:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-05 22:12 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2010-04-06 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-06 20:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-19 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-20 2:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-20 3:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 18:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 19:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-03-31 20:05 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270505579.1477.584.camel@groeck-laptop \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®