mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:21:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273634462-2672-12-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273634462-2672-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>

RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS is set to be 'more negative' than RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS
so that down_read_unfair() can check for active writers by comparing
the rwsem count against RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S      |   10 +++++++++
 arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S  |   17 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index a15b84d..0b3a924 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -16,11 +16,10 @@
  * if there are writers (and maybe) readers waiting (in which case it goes to
  * sleep).
  *
- * The value of WAITING_BIAS supports up to 32766 waiting processes. This can
- * be extended to 65534 by manually checking the whole MSW rather than relying
- * on the S flag.
+ * The WRITE_BIAS value supports up to 32767 processes simultaneously
+ * trying to acquire a write lock.
  *
- * The value of ACTIVE_BIAS supports up to 65535 active processes.
+ * The value of ACTIVE_BIAS supports up to 32767 active processes.
  *
  * This should be totally fair - if anything is waiting, a process that wants a
  * lock will go to the back of the queue. When the currently active lock is
@@ -48,6 +47,8 @@ struct rwsem_waiter;
 extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
  rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
+ rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
  rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
  rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *);
@@ -63,16 +64,19 @@ extern asmregparm struct rw_semaphore *
  */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0xffffffffL
+# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0x7fffffffL
 #else
-# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0x0000ffffL
+# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0x00007fffL
 #endif
 
 #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0x00000000L
 #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS		0x00000001L
 #define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS		(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
 #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS		RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(2 * RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + \
+					 RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
+
+#define __HAVE_DOWN_READ_UNFAIR
 
 typedef signed long rwsem_count_t;
 
@@ -129,6 +133,28 @@ static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 }
 
 /*
+ * lock for reading - skip waiting writers
+ */
+static inline void __down_read_unfair(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	rwsem_count_t tmp;
+
+	tmp = RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
+	asm volatile("# beginning down_read_unfair\n\t"
+		     LOCK_PREFIX "  xadd      %1,(%2)\n\t"
+		     /* adds 0x00000001, returns the old value */
+		     "  cmp       %4,%1\n\t"
+		     /* was the count >= RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS before? */
+		     "  jge       1f\n"
+		     "  call call_rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed\n"
+		     "1:\n"
+		     "# ending down_read_unfair"
+		     : "+m" (sem->count), "=r" (tmp)
+		     : "a" (sem), "1" (tmp), "re" (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+		     : "memory", "cc");
+}
+
+/*
  * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
  */
 static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -248,7 +274,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		     "1:\n\t"
 		     "# ending __downgrade_write\n"
 		     : "+m" (sem->count)
-		     : "a" (sem), "er" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+		     : "a" (sem),
+		       "er" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS - RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
 		     : "memory", "cc");
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
index 770a387..328ef64 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
@@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
 	ret
 	ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
 
+ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed)
+	save_common_regs
+	pushq %rdx
+	movq %rax,%rdi
+	call rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed
+	popq %rdx
+	restore_common_regs
+	ret
+	ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
+
 ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 	save_common_regs
 	movq %rax,%rdi
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S b/arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S
index 63dbf75..115d2ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S
@@ -89,6 +89,23 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
 	CFI_ENDPROC
 	ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
 
+ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed)
+	CFI_STARTPROC
+	push %ecx
+	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4
+	CFI_REL_OFFSET ecx,0
+	push %edx
+	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4
+	CFI_REL_OFFSET edx,0
+	call rwsem_down_read_unfair_failed
+	pop %edx
+	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -4
+	pop %ecx
+	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -4
+	ret
+	CFI_ENDPROC
+	ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
+
 ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 	CFI_STARTPROC
 	push %ecx
-- 
1.7.0.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12  3:20 [PATCH 00/12] rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:21 ` [PATCH 10/12] rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:21 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-05-12  3:21 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 22:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 23:35     ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13  0:32       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 10:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code David Howells
2010-05-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers David Howells
2010-05-13  0:54   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 11:36 ` David Howells
2010-05-12 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable David Howells
2010-05-13  1:12   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics David Howells
2010-05-12 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active David Howells
2010-05-13  2:39   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13  5:41     ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock David Howells
2010-05-12 12:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common David Howells
2010-05-12 12:42 ` David Howells
2010-05-13  2:54   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair David Howells
2010-05-12 13:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation David Howells
2010-05-12 13:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273634462-2672-12-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®