mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:20:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273634462-2672-4-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273634462-2672-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>

Previously each waiting thread added a bias of RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS. With this
change, the bias is added only once when the wait list is non-empty.

This has a few nice properties which will be used in following changes:
- when the mutex is held and the waiter list is known to be non-empty,
  count < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS  <=>  there is an active writer on that sem
- count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS  <=>  there are waiting threads and no
                                     active readers/writers on that sem

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
---
 lib/rwsem.c |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
index caee9b7..0fb6e38 100644
--- a/lib/rwsem.c
+++ b/lib/rwsem.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int downgrading)
 	struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	struct list_head *next;
-	signed long oldcount, woken, loop;
+	signed long oldcount, woken, loop, adjustment;
 
 	waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
 	if (!(waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE))
@@ -68,9 +68,12 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int downgrading)
 	 * write lock. However, we only only wake someone up
 	 * if we can transition the active part of the count from 0 -> 1
 	 */
+	adjustment = RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
+	if (waiter->list.next == &sem->wait_list)
+		adjustment -= RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+
  retry_writer:
-	oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS, sem)
-						- RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS;
+	oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem) - adjustment;
 	if (oldcount & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
 		/* Someone grabbed the sem already */
 		goto undo_writer;
@@ -106,7 +109,10 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int downgrading)
 	} while (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ);
 
 	loop = woken;
-	woken *= RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS - RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+	woken *= RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
+	if (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ)
+		/* hit end of list above */
+		woken -= RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
 
  retry_readers:
 	oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(woken, sem) - woken;
@@ -133,7 +139,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int downgrading)
 
 	/* undo the change to count, but check for a transition 1->0 */
  undo_writer:
-	if (rwsem_atomic_update(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS, sem) & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
+	if (rwsem_atomic_update(-adjustment, sem) & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
 		goto out;
 	goto retry_writer;
 
@@ -160,6 +166,8 @@ rwsem_down_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
 	waiter->task = tsk;
 	get_task_struct(tsk);
 
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+		adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
 	list_add_tail(&waiter->list, &sem->wait_list);
 
 	/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively read-locking */
@@ -193,8 +201,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 
 	waiter.flags = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
-	rwsem_down_failed_common(sem, &waiter,
-				RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS - RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS);
+	rwsem_down_failed_common(sem, &waiter, -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS);
 	return sem;
 }
 
@@ -207,7 +214,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 
 	waiter.flags = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
-	rwsem_down_failed_common(sem, &waiter, -RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS);
+	rwsem_down_failed_common(sem, &waiter, -RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
 
 	return sem;
 }
-- 
1.7.0.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12  3:20 [PATCH 00/12] rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:21 ` [PATCH 10/12] rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:21 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12  3:21 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 22:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 23:35     ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13  0:32       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 10:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code David Howells
2010-05-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers David Howells
2010-05-13  0:54   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 11:36 ` David Howells
2010-05-12 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable David Howells
2010-05-13  1:12   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics David Howells
2010-05-12 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active David Howells
2010-05-13  2:39   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13  5:41     ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock David Howells
2010-05-12 12:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common David Howells
2010-05-12 12:42 ` David Howells
2010-05-13  2:54   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair David Howells
2010-05-12 13:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation David Howells
2010-05-12 13:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273634462-2672-4-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome