From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:21:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273634462-2672-13-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273634462-2672-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
This helps in the following situation:
- Thread A takes a page fault while reading or writing memory.
do_page_fault() acquires the mmap_sem for read and blocks on disk
(either reading the page from file, or hitting swap) for a long time.
- Thread B does an mmap call and blocks trying to acquire the mmap_sem
for write
- Thread C is a monitoring process trying to read every /proc/pid/maps
in the system. This requires acquiring the mmap_sem for read. Thread C
blocks behind B, waiting for A to release the rwsem. If thread C
could be allowed to run in parallel with A, it would probably get done
long before thread A's disk access completes, thus not actually slowing
down thread B.
Test results with down_read_unfair_test (10 seconds):
2.6.33.3:
threadA completes ~600 faults
threadB completes ~300 mmap/munmap cycles
threadC completes ~600 /proc/pid/maps reads
2.6.33.3 + down_read_unfair:
threadA completes ~600 faults
threadB completes ~300 mmap/munmap cycles
threadC completes ~160000 /proc/pid/maps reads
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_nommu.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 8418fcc..9132488 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ struct file *get_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* We need mmap_sem to protect against races with removal of
* VM_EXECUTABLE vmas */
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair(&mm->mmap_sem);
exe_file = mm->exe_file;
if (exe_file)
get_file(exe_file);
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 0705534..09647ad 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
mm = mm_for_maps(priv->task);
if (!mm)
return NULL;
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair(&mm->mmap_sem);
tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task);
priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
index 46d4b5d..56ca830 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
priv->task = NULL;
return NULL;
}
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair(&mm->mmap_sem);
/* start from the Nth VMA */
for (p = rb_first(&mm->mm_rb); p; p = rb_next(p))
--
1.7.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-12 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-12 3:20 [PATCH 00/12] rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:21 ` [PATCH 10/12] rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:21 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 3:21 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-05-12 22:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 23:35 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13 0:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-05-12 10:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] rwsem: test for no active locks in __rwsem_do_wake undo code David Howells
2010-05-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers David Howells
2010-05-13 0:54 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 11:36 ` David Howells
2010-05-12 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable David Howells
2010-05-13 1:12 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86 rwsem: take advantage of new RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS semantics David Howells
2010-05-12 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when other readers are active David Howells
2010-05-13 2:39 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-13 5:41 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock David Howells
2010-05-12 12:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common David Howells
2010-05-12 12:42 ` David Howells
2010-05-13 2:54 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-12 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair David Howells
2010-05-12 13:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation David Howells
2010-05-12 13:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273634462-2672-13-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®