mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292619291-2468-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The synchronize_srcu_expedited() function is currently quick if there
are no active readers, but will delay a full jiffy if there are any.
If these readers leave their SRCU read-side critical sections quickly,
this is way too long to wait.  So this commit first waits ten microseconds,
and only then falls back to jiffy-at-a-time waiting.

Reported-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 init/Kconfig  |   15 +++++++++++++++
 kernel/srcu.c |    8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 929adf6..3551824 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -488,6 +488,21 @@ config RCU_BOOST_DELAY
 
 	  Accept the default if unsure.
 
+config SRCU_SYNCHRONIZE_DELAY
+	int "Microseconds to delay before waiting for readers"
+	range 0 20
+	default 10
+	help
+	  This option controls how long SRCU delays before entering its
+	  loop waiting on SRCU readers.  The purpose of this loop is
+	  to avoid the unconditional context-switch penalty that would
+	  otherwise be incurred if there was an active SRCU reader,
+	  in a manner similar to adaptive locking schemes.  This should
+	  be set to be a bit longer than the common-case SRCU read-side
+	  critical-section overhead.
+
+	  Accept the default if unsure.
+
 endmenu # "RCU Subsystem"
 
 config IKCONFIG
diff --git a/kernel/srcu.c b/kernel/srcu.c
index c71e075..98d8c1e 100644
--- a/kernel/srcu.c
+++ b/kernel/srcu.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/srcu.h>
 
 static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *sp)
@@ -203,9 +204,14 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, void (*sync_func)(void))
 	 * all srcu_read_lock() calls using the old counters have completed.
 	 * Their corresponding critical sections might well be still
 	 * executing, but the srcu_read_lock() primitives themselves
-	 * will have finished executing.
+	 * will have finished executing.  We initially give readers
+	 * an arbitrarily chosen 10 microseconds to get out of their
+	 * SRCU read-side critical sections, then loop waiting 1/HZ
+	 * seconds per iteration.
 	 */
 
+	if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
+		udelay(CONFIG_SRCU_SYNCHRONIZE_DELAY);
 	while (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
 		schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
 
-- 
1.7.3.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 20:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/20] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/20] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 15:52   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 19:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: increase synchronize_sched_expedited() batching Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 16:13   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 20:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-19  9:43       ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-19 16:35         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-20 13:40             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-20 10:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-21  7:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20  2:13   ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-12-20  2:14     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-20 16:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/20] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: remove unused " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292619291-2468-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®