mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292619291-2468-18-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

When the current __call_rcu() function was written, the expedited
APIs did not exist.  The __call_rcu() implementation therefore went
to great lengths to detect the end of old grace periods and to start
new ones, all in the name of reducing grace-period latency.  Now the
expedited APIs do exist, and the usage of __call_rcu() has increased
considerably.  This commit therefore causes __call_rcu() to avoid
worrying about grace periods unless there are a large number of
RCU callbacks stacked up on the current CPU.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 01c8ad3..d0ddfea 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1435,22 +1435,11 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
 	 */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
-	rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
-	check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
 
 	/* Add the callback to our list. */
 	*rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head;
 	rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next;
 
-	/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
-	if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
-		unsigned long nestflag;
-		struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
-
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_root->lock, nestflag);
-		rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag);  /* releases rnp_root->lock. */
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting.
 	 * Enforce hysteresis, and don't invoke force_quiescent_state()
@@ -1459,12 +1448,27 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
 	 * is the only one waiting for a grace period to complete.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
-		rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
-		if (rsp->n_force_qs == rdp->n_force_qs_snap &&
-		    *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != head)
-			force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
-		rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
-		rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
+
+		/* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */
+		rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
+		check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
+
+		/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
+		if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
+			unsigned long nestflag;
+			struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_root->lock, nestflag);
+			rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag);  /* rlses rnp_root->lock */
+		} else {
+			/* Give the grace period a kick. */
+			rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
+			if (rsp->n_force_qs == rdp->n_force_qs_snap &&
+			    *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != head)
+				force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
+			rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
+			rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
+		}
 	} else if (ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs), jiffies))
 		force_quiescent_state(rsp, 1);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
-- 
1.7.3.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 20:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/20] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/20] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 15:52   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 19:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: increase synchronize_sched_expedited() batching Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 16:13   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 20:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-19  9:43       ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-19 16:35         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-20 13:40             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-20 10:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-21  7:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20  2:13   ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-12-20  2:14     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-20 16:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/20] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: remove unused " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292619291-2468-18-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®