From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292619291-2468-18-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
When the current __call_rcu() function was written, the expedited
APIs did not exist. The __call_rcu() implementation therefore went
to great lengths to detect the end of old grace periods and to start
new ones, all in the name of reducing grace-period latency. Now the
expedited APIs do exist, and the usage of __call_rcu() has increased
considerably. This commit therefore causes __call_rcu() to avoid
worrying about grace periods unless there are a large number of
RCU callbacks stacked up on the current CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 01c8ad3..d0ddfea 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1435,22 +1435,11 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
- rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
- check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
/* Add the callback to our list. */
*rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head;
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next;
- /* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
- if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
- unsigned long nestflag;
- struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_root->lock, nestflag);
- rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag); /* releases rnp_root->lock. */
- }
-
/*
* Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting.
* Enforce hysteresis, and don't invoke force_quiescent_state()
@@ -1459,12 +1448,27 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
* is the only one waiting for a grace period to complete.
*/
if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
- rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
- if (rsp->n_force_qs == rdp->n_force_qs_snap &&
- *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != head)
- force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
- rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
- rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
+
+ /* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */
+ rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
+ check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
+
+ /* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
+ if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
+ unsigned long nestflag;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_root->lock, nestflag);
+ rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag); /* rlses rnp_root->lock */
+ } else {
+ /* Give the grace period a kick. */
+ rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
+ if (rsp->n_force_qs == rdp->n_force_qs_snap &&
+ *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != head)
+ force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
+ rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
+ rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
+ }
} else if (ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs), jiffies))
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 1);
local_irq_restore(flags);
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 20:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/20] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/20] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 19:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: increase synchronize_sched_expedited() batching Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-19 9:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-19 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-20 13:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-20 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-21 7:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 2:13 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-12-20 2:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-20 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/20] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: remove unused " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292619291-2468-18-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®