mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/20] rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292619291-2468-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Some recent benchmarks have indicated possible lock contention on the
leaf-level rcu_node locks.  This commit therefore limits the number of
CPUs per leaf-level rcu_node structure to 16, in other words, there
can be at most 16 rcu_data structures fanning into a given rcu_node
structure.  Prior to this, the limit was 32 on 32-bit systems and 64 on
64-bit systems.

Note that the fanout of non-leaf rcu_node structures is unchanged.  The
organization of accesses to the rcu_node tree is such that references
to non-leaf rcu_node structures are much less frequent than to the
leaf structures.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |    3 ++-
 kernel/rcutree.h |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index c39ec5b..01c8ad3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1869,8 +1869,9 @@ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+	for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i > 0; i--)
 		rsp->levelspread[i] = CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT;
+	rsp->levelspread[0] = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
 }
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT */
 static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 1a54be2..e8f057e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -31,46 +31,51 @@
 /*
  * Define shape of hierarchy based on NR_CPUS and CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT.
  * In theory, it should be possible to add more levels straightforwardly.
- * In practice, this has not been tested, so there is probably some
- * bug somewhere.
+ * In practice, this did work well going from three levels to four.
+ * Of course, your mileage may vary.
  */
 #define MAX_RCU_LVLS 4
-#define RCU_FANOUT	      (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
-#define RCU_FANOUT_SQ	      (RCU_FANOUT * RCU_FANOUT)
-#define RCU_FANOUT_CUBE	      (RCU_FANOUT_SQ * RCU_FANOUT)
-#define RCU_FANOUT_FOURTH     (RCU_FANOUT_CUBE * RCU_FANOUT)
-
-#if NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT
+#if CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > 16
+#define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF       16
+#else /* #if CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > 16 */
+#define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF       (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
+#endif /* #else #if CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT > 16 */
+#define RCU_FANOUT_1	      (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
+#define RCU_FANOUT_2	      (RCU_FANOUT_1 * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
+#define RCU_FANOUT_3	      (RCU_FANOUT_2 * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
+#define RCU_FANOUT_4	      (RCU_FANOUT_3 * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
+
+#if NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_1
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVLS	      1
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_0	      1
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      (NR_CPUS)
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      0
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      0
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_4	      0
-#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_SQ
+#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_2
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVLS	      2
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_0	      1
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      (NR_CPUS)
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      0
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_4	      0
-#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_CUBE
+#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_3
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVLS	      3
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_0	      1
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_SQ)
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT)
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      NR_CPUS
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_2)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      (NR_CPUS)
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_4	      0
-#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_FOURTH
+#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_4
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVLS	      4
 #  define NUM_RCU_LVL_0	      1
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_CUBE)
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_SQ)
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT)
-#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_4	      NR_CPUS
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_1	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_3)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_2	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_2)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_3	      DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
+#  define NUM_RCU_LVL_4	      (NR_CPUS)
 #else
 # error "CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT insufficient for NR_CPUS"
-#endif /* #if (NR_CPUS) <= RCU_FANOUT */
+#endif /* #if (NR_CPUS) <= RCU_FANOUT_1 */
 
 #define RCU_SUM (NUM_RCU_LVL_0 + NUM_RCU_LVL_1 + NUM_RCU_LVL_2 + NUM_RCU_LVL_3 + NUM_RCU_LVL_4)
 #define NUM_RCU_NODES (RCU_SUM - NR_CPUS)
-- 
1.7.3.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 20:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/20] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/20] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/20] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 15:52   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 19:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: increase synchronize_sched_expedited() batching Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-18 16:13   ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 20:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-19  9:43       ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-19 16:35         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-20 13:40             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-20 10:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-21  7:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-20  2:13   ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-12-20  2:14     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-20 16:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/20] rculist: fix borked __list_for_each_rcu() macro Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 20:54 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: remove unused " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292619291-2468-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®