mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:20:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297282835.18212.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297282433.3016.43.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:13 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:02 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 11:00 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > > x86_64, nearly allmodconfig.  No target hardware.

<SNIP>

> > <nod>  I believe the above patch resolves the specific rmmod issue.
> > However, during SLUB poisioning testing we also came across errors with
> > the incorrect use of struct config_item_operations->release() in
> > target_core_configfs.c and target_core_fabric_configfs.c code.  The
> > series to address these was included in the last series to James here:
> > 
> > [PATCH 00/12] target: Updates for .38-rc4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129680191624837&w=2
> > 
> > Note that this series for-38 mainline needs to be applied on top of the
> > original update series after the drivers/target/ mainline merge:
> > 
> > [PATCH 00/24] target updates for .38-rc3 (v2)
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129632617326015&w=2
> > 
> > The entire series is available from
> >      
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/scsi-post-merge-2.6.git for-38-rc4
> > 
> > James, please review + sign-off so we can get these updates into mainline.
> 
> Firstly, could we get the serious bug fixes identified and separated
> from the general enhancement updates, so they can go in a fixes tree
> without depending on enhancements?  The former category would include
> the /proc interface removal, since we don't want the legacy interface to
> be in a released kernel.
> 

Everything in those two series should be considered bug fixes and
immediate for-38 mainline material.

The target_core_mib.c statistics logic using procfs seq_list() has been
removed in [PATCH 12/12] of the most recent series above.

Thanks,

--nab



  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-09 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-08  0:23 Linux 2.6.38-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 10:17 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Borislav Petkov
2011-02-08 10:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 12:11     ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 12:14       ` [PATCH 2/2] timer: use local_bh_enable_force_wake() in del_timer_sync() Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:34       ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 14:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 15:15             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-08 15:51             ` [tip:core/urgent] Revert "lockdep, timer: Fix del_timer_sync() annotation" tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-09  1:46             ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 14:51             ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 18:53               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 20:28 ` Heads up Linux 2.6.38-rc4 compile problems Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-08 20:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09  9:01     ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-09 14:59       ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-09 16:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-13 17:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14  2:04             ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14  2:45               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14  3:40                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14  5:34                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 15:26                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 15:37                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 16:37                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 17:39                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 17:49                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 18:08                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 19:44                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 20:13                               ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-14 18:25                         ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-14 16:58                     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-15 14:07                       ` [Crash-utility] " Dave Anderson
2011-02-09 17:08 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (test_nx: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 17:10   ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-02-17 19:33     ` Kees Cook
2011-02-09 17:24 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (hysdn: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 21:25     ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 21:57       ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:00         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 17:26 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (tty/ifx6x60: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 18:28   ` Alan Cox
2011-02-09 17:28 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:00   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 20:02     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:13       ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:20         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2011-02-09 20:28           ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:44             ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 17:36 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 22:01   ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:16     ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10  4:58     ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: x25) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10  5:48       ` David Miller
2011-02-10  6:29         ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10  6:35           ` David Miller
2011-02-10 19:34   ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: ipmi Oops) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 20:03     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-10 20:08       ` Corey Minyard
2011-02-10 21:41       ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297282835.18212.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
    --to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®