From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:28:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297283335.3016.48.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297282835.18212.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:13 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Firstly, could we get the serious bug fixes identified and separated
> > from the general enhancement updates, so they can go in a fixes tree
> > without depending on enhancements? The former category would include
> > the /proc interface removal, since we don't want the legacy interface to
> > be in a released kernel.
> >
>
> Everything in those two series should be considered bug fixes and
> immediate for-38 mainline material.
Things like this:
target: remove EXTRA_CFLAGS
target: Remove unnecessary container_of() pointer check
target: Remove unnecessary se_clear_dev_ports legacy code
target: Remove spurious double cast from structure macro accessors
target: Convert TMR REQ/RSP definitions to target namespace
target: Minor sparse warning fixes and annotations
target: Remove unneeded test of se_cmd
Are not serious bug fixes. I could go either way on some of the error path changes.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 0:23 Linux 2.6.38-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 10:17 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Borislav Petkov
2011-02-08 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 12:11 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] timer: use local_bh_enable_force_wake() in del_timer_sync() Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:34 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-08 15:51 ` [tip:core/urgent] Revert "lockdep, timer: Fix del_timer_sync() annotation" tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-09 1:46 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 14:51 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 18:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 20:28 ` Heads up Linux 2.6.38-rc4 compile problems Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-08 20:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 9:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-09 14:59 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-09 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-13 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 2:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 2:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 3:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 5:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 15:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 17:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 19:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-14 18:25 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-14 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-15 14:07 ` [Crash-utility] " Dave Anderson
2011-02-09 17:08 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (test_nx: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 17:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-02-17 19:33 ` Kees Cook
2011-02-09 17:24 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (hysdn: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 21:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 21:57 ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 17:26 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (tty/ifx6x60: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2011-02-09 17:28 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 20:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:13 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:28 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-02-09 20:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 17:36 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 22:01 ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 4:58 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: x25) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 5:48 ` David Miller
2011-02-10 6:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 6:35 ` David Miller
2011-02-10 19:34 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: ipmi Oops) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-10 20:08 ` Corey Minyard
2011-02-10 21:41 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297283335.3016.48.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®