From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: x25)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:48:57 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110209.214857.189691158.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110209205842.c25aa64a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:58:42 -0800
> Here's what I captured before the system hung and the beeper stayed
> on constantly. ;)
:-)
> [ 303.931229] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> [ 303.934923] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb6/6-1/6-1.3/devnum
> [ 303.934923] CPU 1
> [ 303.934923] Modules linked in: x25(-) af_packet nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss exportfs sunrpc ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables ip6t_REJECT xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf binfmt_misc dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath scsi_dh dm_mod joydev mousedev evdev mac_hid snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device usbmouse usbkbd usbhid snd_pcm hid snd_timer sr_mod tg3 pcspkr rtc_cmos dcdbas sg snd iTCO_wdt cdrom i2c_i801 rtc_core processor iTCO_vendor_support rtc_lib 8250_pnp soundcore thermal_sys intel_agp button intel_gtt snd_page_alloc hwmon unix ide_pci_generic ide_core ata_generic pata_acpi ata_piix sd_mod crc_t10dif ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ssb mmc_core pcmcia pcmcia_core firmware_class ehci_hcd usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: microcode]
> [ 303.934923]
> [ 303.934923] Pid: 2573, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.38-rc4 #3 0TY565/OptiPlex 745
> [ 303.934923] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa069c131>] [<ffffffffa069c131>] x25_link_free+0x41/0x81 [x25]
Ok, a GPF in x25_link_free().
This code simply traverses the x25_neigh_list, unlinking and releasing
each entry it finds.
Every node entry which is added to this list is dynamically allocated
entry. See x25_link_device_up(), which is the only place where a
list_add() is performed on the x25_neigh_list.
The device should be accessible and the dev_put() should not cause
trouble because we grabbed a reference to this device when
x25_link_device_up() added the new x25_neigh to the list.
I can't see anything here that should barf like this.
I also can't see anything "const" in the x25 protocol code that might
be trampled upon.
I'm assuming in all of this that it's a write to a read-only location
which is causing this GPF, via CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.
Playing around with config options and looking at the various x86_64 asm
in these different cases seems to suggest that it's indeed the dev_put()
that is causing the GPF.
Network devices use per-cpu refcounts.
We know that at some point in the past, the ref bump worked, because
we did a dev_hold() when we added the referencing x25_neigh entry to
the list.
For some reason now it fails.
RAX is where the per-cpu base pointer should be, and in your dump
that's:
[ 303.934923] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffffffffa06a03d0 RCX: 0010000000004040
Which is the SLAB free poison value.
So it seems like the network device at nb->dev has been freed for some
reason.
Weird....
Oh, the bug is obvious... 'nb' is freed right before we 'nb->dev', duh.
Please try this fix:
--------------------
x25: Do not reference freed memory.
In x25_link_free(), we destroy 'nb' before dereferencing
'nb->dev'. Don't do this, because 'nb' might be freed
by then.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_link.c b/net/x25/x25_link.c
index 4cbc942..2130692 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_link.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_link.c
@@ -396,9 +396,12 @@ void __exit x25_link_free(void)
write_lock_bh(&x25_neigh_list_lock);
list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &x25_neigh_list) {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
nb = list_entry(entry, struct x25_neigh, node);
+ dev = nb->dev;
__x25_remove_neigh(nb);
- dev_put(nb->dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
}
write_unlock_bh(&x25_neigh_list_lock);
}
--
1.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 0:23 Linux 2.6.38-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 10:17 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Borislav Petkov
2011-02-08 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 12:11 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] timer: use local_bh_enable_force_wake() in del_timer_sync() Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:34 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-08 15:51 ` [tip:core/urgent] Revert "lockdep, timer: Fix del_timer_sync() annotation" tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-09 1:46 ` lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4) Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 14:51 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-14 18:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 20:28 ` Heads up Linux 2.6.38-rc4 compile problems Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-08 20:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 9:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-09 14:59 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-09 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-13 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 2:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 2:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 3:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 5:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 15:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 17:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-14 19:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-14 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-14 18:25 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-14 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-15 14:07 ` [Crash-utility] " Dave Anderson
2011-02-09 17:08 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (test_nx: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 17:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-02-17 19:33 ` Kees Cook
2011-02-09 17:24 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (hysdn: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 21:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 21:57 ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 17:26 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (tty/ifx6x60: BUG) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2011-02-09 17:28 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 20:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:13 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:28 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 17:36 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 22:01 ` David Miller
2011-02-09 22:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 4:58 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: x25) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 5:48 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-02-10 6:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 6:35 ` David Miller
2011-02-10 19:34 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (other bugs: ipmi Oops) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-10 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-10 20:08 ` Corey Minyard
2011-02-10 21:41 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110209.214857.189691158.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®