From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: srostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, efault@gmx.de, ghaskins@novell.com,
mingo@elte.hu, stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference" has been added to the 2.6.32-longterm tree
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:02:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12978046423644@kroah.org>
[ Added LKML ]
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:17 -0800, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference
>
> to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> 0006-sched-Give-CPU-bound-RT-tasks-preference.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree,
> please let <stable@kernel.org> know about it.
>
>
I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm
curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a
performance improvement and not a critical bug fix.
-- Steve
> >From 10db390cadda977081a7a34f60b8ce62557521c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: stable-bot for Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:21:08 +0100
> Subject: sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference
>
> From:: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> Commit: b3bc211cfe7d5fe94b310480d78e00bea96fbf2a upstream
>
> If a high priority task is waking up on a CPU that is running a
> lower priority task that is bound to a CPU, see if we can move the
> high RT task to another CPU first. Note, if all other CPUs are
> running higher priority tasks than the CPU bounded current task,
> then it will be preempted regardless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
> LKML-Reference: <20100921024138.888922071@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -965,7 +965,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> * For equal prio tasks, we just let the scheduler sort it out.
> */
> if (unlikely(rt_task(rq->curr)) &&
> - rq->curr->prio < p->prio &&
> + (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
> + rq->curr->prio < p->prio) &&
> (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
> int cpu = find_lowest_rq(p);
>
> @@ -1493,9 +1494,10 @@ static void task_woken_rt(struct rq *rq,
> if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
> !test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr) &&
> has_pushable_tasks(rq) &&
> + p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
> rt_task(rq->curr) &&
> - rq->curr->prio < p->prio &&
> - p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
> + (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
> + rq->curr->prio < p->prio))
> push_rt_tasks(rq);
> }
>
>
>
> Patches currently in longterm-queue-2.6.32 which might be from srostedt@redhat.com are
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12978046423644@kroah.org>
2011-02-15 23:02 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-02-15 23:32 ` Greg KH
2011-02-16 2:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 2:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-16 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 14:29 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 5:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 6:22 ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-02-17 7:52 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 9:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 14:28 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®