From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
srostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ghaskins@novell.com, mingo@elte.hu,
stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference" has been added to the 2.6.32-longterm tree
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:46:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297824392.5126.52.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110215233210.GA3378@suse.de>
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 15:32 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:02:47PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > [ Added LKML ]
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:17 -0800, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > >
> > > sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference
> > >
> > > to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
> > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary
> > >
> > > The filename of the patch is:
> > > 0006-sched-Give-CPU-bound-RT-tasks-preference.patch
> > > and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.
> > >
> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree,
> > > please let <stable@kernel.org> know about it.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm
> > curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a
> > performance improvement and not a critical bug fix.
>
> I'll defer to Mike here, as he submitted this series. I'm pretty sure
> it resolves a number of problems reported with the schedular, overall,
> with the whole series, right?
>
> Mike?
This particular patch was purely about performance. The general thrust
of the series is of course about getting reported issues fixed. We've
got bug reports, and I'm sure everyone else does too.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12978046423644@kroah.org>
2011-02-15 23:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-15 23:32 ` Greg KH
2011-02-16 2:46 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-02-16 2:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-16 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 14:29 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 5:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 6:22 ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-02-17 7:52 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 9:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 14:28 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297824392.5126.52.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome