From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, srostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ghaskins@novell.com, mingo@elte.hu,
stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference" has been added to the 2.6.32-longterm tree
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:01:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297821667.5126.11.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:02 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Added LKML ]
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:17 -0800, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >
> > sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference
> >
> > to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary
> >
> > The filename of the patch is:
> > 0006-sched-Give-CPU-bound-RT-tasks-preference.patch
> > and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.
> >
> > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree,
> > please let <stable@kernel.org> know about it.
> >
> >
>
> I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm
> curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a
> performance improvement and not a critical bug fix.
Yes, I added it for the performance. .32-stable is enterprise beans and
biscuits. Same reason I added the load balancing fixes, boxen won't
explode without them, but load balancing performs better with them.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12978046423644@kroah.org>
2011-02-15 23:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-15 23:32 ` Greg KH
2011-02-16 2:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 2:01 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-02-16 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-16 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 14:29 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 5:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 6:22 ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-02-17 7:52 ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17 9:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 14:28 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297821667.5126.11.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome