mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, srostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ghaskins@novell.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference" has been added to the 2.6.32-longterm tree
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:01:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297821667.5126.11.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:02 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Added LKML ]
> 
> On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:17 -0800, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > 
> >     sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference
> > 
> > to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
> >     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary
> > 
> > The filename of the patch is:
> >      0006-sched-Give-CPU-bound-RT-tasks-preference.patch
> > and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.
> > 
> > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree,
> > please let <stable@kernel.org> know about it.
> > 
> > 
> 
> I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm
> curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a
> performance improvement and not a critical bug fix.

Yes, I added it for the performance.  .32-stable is enterprise beans and
biscuits.  Same reason I added the load balancing fixes, boxen won't
explode without them, but load balancing performs better with them.

	-Mike




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-16  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <12978046423644@kroah.org>
2011-02-15 23:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-15 23:32   ` Greg KH
2011-02-16  2:46     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16  2:01   ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-02-16  2:03     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-16  8:25     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16  8:55       ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-16  9:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16  9:45         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-16 14:29           ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17  5:05             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17  6:22               ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-02-17  7:52               ` Stefan Richter
2011-02-17  9:41                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-17 14:28                   ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297821667.5126.11.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome