mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com,
	ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
	robert.richter@amd.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2011 16:49:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317912555-9559-9-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317912555-9559-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* is disabled for:
- SW events (sw counters, tracepoints)
- HW breakpoints
- ALL but Intel X86 architecture
- AMD64 processors

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
 arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c       |    4 ++++
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c         |    4 ++++
 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c        |    4 ++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c     |    4 ++++
 arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c          |    4 ++++
 arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c       |    4 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c |    3 +++
 kernel/events/core.c                 |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c        |    6 ++++++
 9 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
index 8143cd7..0dae252 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -685,6 +685,10 @@ static int alpha_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event->attr.type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
 	case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 53c9c26..bcb0dd1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -544,6 +544,10 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_smpl(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event->attr.type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
 	case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c
index 0aee944..425c35a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -370,6 +370,10 @@ static int mipspmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event->attr.type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
 	case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
index 10a140f..5701051 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1078,6 +1078,10 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (!ppmu)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event->attr.type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
 		ev = event->attr.config;
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
index 2ee21a4..7cc9066 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -309,6 +309,10 @@ static int sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event->attr.type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
 	case PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE:
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
index 614da62..8e16a4a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1105,6 +1105,10 @@ static int sparc_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (atomic_read(&nmi_active) < 0)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	/* does not support taken branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (attr->type) {
 	case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
 		if (attr->config >= sparc_pmu->max_events)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 941caa2..81a9b5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ static int amd_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 70a8975..e5caab5 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5104,6 +5104,12 @@ static int perf_swevent_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for software events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	switch (event_id) {
 	case PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK:
 	case PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK:
@@ -5207,6 +5213,12 @@ static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	err = perf_trace_init(event);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -5430,6 +5442,12 @@ static int cpu_clock_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.config != PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for software events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	perf_swevent_init_hrtimer(event);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -5502,6 +5520,12 @@ static int task_clock_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.config != PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for software events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	perf_swevent_init_hrtimer(event);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index b7971d6..e7fb781 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -581,6 +581,12 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_event_init(struct perf_event *bp)
 	if (bp->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for breakpoint events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(bp))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	err = register_perf_hw_breakpoint(bp);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
-- 
1.7.4.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-06 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 14:49 [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 16:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:28     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:44         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:34     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 18:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:32   ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-06 16:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 17:14       ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-10  6:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10  9:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07  7:06       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 10:38     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:40       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:49           ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 11:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:54               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 13:31                 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10  7:04                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10  6:09                 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 14:05                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10 14:45                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-11 12:59                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-12  7:06                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-13 10:54                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-13 11:01                           ` [RFC PATCH] x86: Add a sanity test of x86 decoder Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-18  6:54                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-19  4:29                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-19  6:44                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-20 14:01                                   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2011-11-18 23:16                                     ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: Add a build-time sanity test to the " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-20 14:01                                   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] [RESEND] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 15:42             ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 11:25       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 11:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 15:44           ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 15:09         ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 16:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-10-06 18:53   ` [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:25     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 10:23   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 21:41   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317912555-9559-9-git-send-email-eranian@google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®