Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers: staging: rts_pstor fixed checkpatch warnings

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:14 +0200, Pelle Windestam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > This looked nicer in the original version.  I know that checkpatch
> > complains but in the end, checkpatch is just a perl script.  It's
> > less sentient than a squirrel.

I agree.

That's good happy cheery imagery Dan,
but I might have chosen a cockroach too.

> I have to agree with you on that, but I wasn't sure how strictly to
> follow the checkpatch warnings. I'll happily resubmit the patch
> without this change if nobody minds.
 
> -static struct pci_device_id rtsx_ids[] = {
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5208, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5209, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5288, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rtsx_ids) = {
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5208, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5209, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5288, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
>  	{ 0, },

Maybe use PCI_DEVICE

static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rtsx_ids) = {
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5208), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5209), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5288), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ 0, },

You could also substitute PCI_VENDOR_ID_REALTEK for 0x10ec