From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/28] rcu: Omit self-awaken when setting up expedited grace period
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:30:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320265849-5744-11-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111102203017.GA3830@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
When setting up an expedited grace period, if there were no readers, the
task will awaken itself. This commit removes this useless self-awakening.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
kernel/rcutree.h | 3 ++-
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 17 +++++++++++------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index c097394..bbcafba 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
else
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP)
- rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp);
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, true);
rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 0963fa1..fd2f87d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -444,7 +444,8 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu);
static void rcu_preempt_process_callbacks(void);
void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU)
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ bool wake);
#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) */
static int rcu_preempt_pending(int cpu);
static int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 708dc57..7a7961f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
* then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy.
*/
if (!empty_exp && empty_exp_now)
- rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp);
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp, true);
} else {
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -732,9 +732,13 @@ static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* recursively up the tree. (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
* iteratively!)
*
+ * Most callers will set the "wake" flag, but the task initiating the
+ * expedited grace period need not wake itself.
+ *
* Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
*/
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ bool wake)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask;
@@ -747,7 +751,8 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
}
if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
+ if (wake)
+ wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
break;
}
mask = rnp->grpmask;
@@ -780,7 +785,7 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
must_wait = 1;
}
if (!must_wait)
- rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp);
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, false); /* Don't wake self. */
}
/*
@@ -1072,9 +1077,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
* report on tasks preempted in RCU read-side critical sections during
* expedited RCU grace periods.
*/
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ bool wake)
{
- return;
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-02 20:30 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/28] Preview of RCU changes for 3.3 Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/28] powerpc: Strengthen value-returning-atomics memory barriers Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/28] rcu: ->signaled better named ->fqs_state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/28] rcu: Avoid RCU-preempt expedited grace-period botch Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/28] rcu: Make synchronize_sched_expedited() better at work sharing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/28] lockdep: Update documentation for lock-class leak detection Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 2:57 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-09 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-10 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/28] rcu: Track idleness independent of idle tasks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/28] trace: Allow ftrace_dump() to be called from modules Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/28] rcu: Add failure tracing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/28] rcu: Document failing tick as cause of RCU CPU stall warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 3:07 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 13:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/28] rcu: Disable preemption in rcu_is_cpu_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-11-03 3:16 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/28] rcu: Omit self-awaken when setting up expedited grace period Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/28] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/28] rcu: Inform the user about extended quiescent state on PROVE_RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/28] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/28] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/28] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/28] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 3:48 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 11:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-03 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 13:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 13:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 13:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/28] nohz: Separate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/28] nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handling seperately from tick stop Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:00 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 11:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-03 13:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 15:31 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-09 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-09 16:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-10 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-10 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-15 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-16 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/28] x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 21/28] x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 22/28] rcu: Fix early call to rcu_idle_enter() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 23/28] powerpc: Tell RCU about idle after hcall tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 24/28] rcu: Introduce bulk reference count Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:34 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 13:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 20:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-29 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-29 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 25/28] rcu: Deconfuse dynticks entry-exit tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 26/28] rcu: Add more information to the wrong-idle-task complaint Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 27/28] rcu: Allow dyntick-idle mode for CPUs with callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:47 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 28/28] rcu: Fix idle-task checks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:55 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 23:05 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-09 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-03 4:55 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/28] Preview of RCU changes for 3.3 Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320265849-5744-11-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®