From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/28] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320265849-5744-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111102203017.GA3830@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Simplify things a bit by substituting the definitions of the single-line
rcu_read_acquire(), rcu_read_release(), rcu_read_acquire_bh(),
rcu_read_release_bh(), rcu_read_acquire_sched(), and
rcu_read_release_sched() functions at their call points.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 53 +++++++---------------------------------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index d201c15..5dd6fd8 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -250,41 +250,8 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
}
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_bh(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_bh(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_sched(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_sched(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
/**
@@ -364,12 +331,8 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
-# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_bh() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_bh() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_sched() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_sched() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_acquire(a) do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_release(a) do { } while (0)
static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
{
@@ -690,7 +653,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
{
__rcu_read_lock();
__acquire(RCU);
- rcu_read_acquire();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
}
/*
@@ -710,7 +673,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
- rcu_read_release();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
__release(RCU);
__rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -731,7 +694,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
{
local_bh_disable();
__acquire(RCU_BH);
- rcu_read_acquire_bh();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
}
/*
@@ -741,7 +704,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
{
- rcu_read_release_bh();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
__release(RCU_BH);
local_bh_enable();
}
@@ -758,7 +721,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
{
preempt_disable();
__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
- rcu_read_acquire_sched();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
}
/* Used by lockdep and tracing: cannot be traced, cannot call lockdep. */
@@ -775,7 +738,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
{
- rcu_read_release_sched();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
__release(RCU_SCHED);
preempt_enable();
}
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-02 20:30 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/28] Preview of RCU changes for 3.3 Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/28] powerpc: Strengthen value-returning-atomics memory barriers Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/28] rcu: ->signaled better named ->fqs_state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/28] rcu: Avoid RCU-preempt expedited grace-period botch Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/28] rcu: Make synchronize_sched_expedited() better at work sharing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/28] lockdep: Update documentation for lock-class leak detection Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 2:57 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-09 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-10 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/28] rcu: Track idleness independent of idle tasks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/28] trace: Allow ftrace_dump() to be called from modules Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/28] rcu: Add failure tracing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/28] rcu: Document failing tick as cause of RCU CPU stall warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 3:07 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 13:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/28] rcu: Disable preemption in rcu_is_cpu_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/28] rcu: Omit self-awaken when setting up expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 3:16 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/28] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/28] rcu: Inform the user about extended quiescent state on PROVE_RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/28] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/28] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an " Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/28] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 3:48 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 11:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-03 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 13:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 13:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 13:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/28] nohz: Separate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/28] nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handling seperately from tick stop Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:00 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 11:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-03 13:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 15:31 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-09 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-09 16:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-10 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-10 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-15 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-16 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/28] x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 21/28] x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 22/28] rcu: Fix early call to rcu_idle_enter() Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 23/28] powerpc: Tell RCU about idle after hcall tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 24/28] rcu: Introduce bulk reference count Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:34 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 13:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 20:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-29 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-29 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-28 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 25/28] rcu: Deconfuse dynticks entry-exit tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 26/28] rcu: Add more information to the wrong-idle-task complaint Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 27/28] rcu: Allow dyntick-idle mode for CPUs with callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:47 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 20:30 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 28/28] rcu: Fix idle-task checks Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 4:55 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-03 23:05 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-09 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-03 4:55 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/28] Preview of RCU changes for 3.3 Josh Triplett
2011-11-03 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320265849-5744-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®