mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	autofs@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:32:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329964322.2244.22.camel@perseus.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyRFGrT6uSSCQoX0pZPZ7j2p4oqX-dcfsFUZt4q81qMrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:25 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, that's true, and you'll see it uses the mount option maxproto with
> > the value of AUTOFS_MAX_PROTO_VERSION. But autofs uses it's own copy of
> > the headers so AUTOFS_MAX_PROTO_VERSION is 4 not 5 so it won't be
> > affected by this change.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> I fetched your git tree, and it seems this changed to use mount()
> directly in commit a74f68c99d9f ("integrated master map parsing into
> daemon") back in 2006.
> 
> Which seems to be part of autofs_5_0_0_beta1, so I guess we're safe. I
> hope no distro ever used any early pre-beta versions of autofs that
> had the new packet support but still used the external 'mount'
> command.

If there are they have bigger automount problem than the kernel packet
size, ;)

It really didn't become usable until at least the rc releases and the
actual first non-test release was 5.0.1, we never had a 5.0.0.

Ian



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-23  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-22  2:24 Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:16 ` David Miller
2012-02-22  3:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  4:20       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  4:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  5:43         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:53           ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:57             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  9:32               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:15                 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:39                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:45                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 15:13                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23  1:35                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:12                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  1:48                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  1:54                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:21                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:29                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:31                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 11:20                             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 11:26                               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  8:54                         ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-23  1:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:09                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:11                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:32                           ` Ian Kent [this message]
2012-02-25 11:28               ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-25 22:10               ` [PATCH] autofs4: fix compilation without CONFIG_COMPAT Andreas Schwab
2012-02-26  1:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  1:46                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  1:53                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  3:07                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  9:05                   ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-27  7:29                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-02-27  9:09                     ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27 16:22                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-27 16:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-27  9:20                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  6:02           ` compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 16:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 17:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 17:45               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 18:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:19                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:20                   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1329964322.2244.22.camel@perseus.themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome