mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org,
	michael.brantley@deshaw.com, sven.breuner@itwm.fraunhofer.de,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, pstaubach@exagrid.com,
	malahal@us.ibm.com, bfields@fieldses.org,
	trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, rees@umich.edu
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3] vfs: make fstatat retry once on ESTALE errors from getattr call
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:52:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334749927-26138-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334316311-22331-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

ESTALE errors are a source of pain for many users of NFS. Usually they
occur when a file is removed from the server after a successful lookup
against it.

Luckily, the remedy in these cases is usually simple. We should just
redo the lookup, forcing revalidations all the way in and then retry the
call. We of course cannot do this for syscalls that do not involve a
path, but for path-based syscalls we can and should attempt to recover
from an ESTALE.

This patch implements this by having the VFS reattempt the lookup (with
LOOKUP_REVAL set) and call exactly once when it would ordinarily return
ESTALE. This should catch the bulk of these cases under normal usage,
without unduly inconveniencing other filesystems that return ESTALE on
path-based syscalls.

Note that it's possible to hit this race more than once, but a single
retry should catch the bulk of these cases under normal circumstances.

This patch is just an example. We'll alter most path-based syscalls in a
similar fashion to fix this correctly. At this point, I'm just trying to
ensure that the retry semantics are acceptable before I being that work.

Does anyone have strong objections to this patch? I'm aware that the
retry mechanism is not as robust as many (e.g. Peter) would like, but it
should at least improve the current situation.

If no one has a strong objection, then I'll start going through and
adding similar code to the other syscalls. And we can hopefully we can
get at least some of them in for 3.5.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/stat.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c
index c733dc5..0ee9cb4 100644
--- a/fs/stat.c
+++ b/fs/stat.c
@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ int vfs_fstatat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, struct kstat *stat,
 {
 	struct path path;
 	int error = -EINVAL;
-	int lookup_flags = 0;
+	bool retried = false;
+	unsigned int lookup_flags = 0;
 
 	if ((flag & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT |
 		      AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0)
@@ -84,12 +85,18 @@ int vfs_fstatat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, struct kstat *stat,
 	if (flag & AT_EMPTY_PATH)
 		lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_EMPTY;
 
+retry:
 	error = user_path_at(dfd, filename, lookup_flags, &path);
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
 	error = vfs_getattr(path.mnt, path.dentry, stat);
 	path_put(&path);
+	if (error == -ESTALE && !retried) {
+		retried = true;
+		lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_REVAL;
+		goto retry;
+	}
 out:
 	return error;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-18 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 11:25 [PATCH RFC] vfs: make fstatat retry " Jeff Layton
2012-04-13 12:02 ` Jim Rees
2012-04-13 12:09   ` Jeff Layton
     [not found] ` <20120413150518.GA1987@us.ibm.com>
2012-04-13 15:42   ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-13 16:07     ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-13 17:10       ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-13 17:34       ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-13 23:00         ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-14  0:57         ` Trond Myklebust
2012-04-15 19:03     ` Bernd Schubert
2012-04-15 19:27       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-16 14:23         ` Bernd Schubert
2012-04-15 19:57       ` Chuck Lever
2012-04-16 11:23         ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 11:53         ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-16 11:36       ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-16 12:54         ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-16 16:04           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-16 14:44         ` Bernd Schubert
2012-04-16 17:46           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-16 19:33             ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-04-16 19:43               ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-16 20:25                 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-04-16 23:05                   ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 11:46                     ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-17 13:36                       ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 14:14                         ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-17 14:27                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-17 15:02                             ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 15:50                               ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-17 16:03                                 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 15:59                               ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-17 13:12                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-17 13:32                       ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 14:03                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-17 14:22                           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 14:04                         ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-04-17 14:20                           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-17 15:45                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-17 16:02                               ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-17 13:39                     ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-17 14:08                       ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-04-17 14:48                         ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-18 15:16                           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-16 19:43             ` Scott Lovenberg
2012-04-16 16:55 ` [PATCH RFC v2] " Jeff Layton
2012-04-18 11:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2012-04-20 14:40   ` [PATCH RFC v3] vfs: make fstatat retry once " Jeff Layton
2012-04-20 20:18     ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-20 20:37       ` Malahal Naineni
2012-04-20 21:13         ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-22  5:40           ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-23 12:00             ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 13:00               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-23 13:12                 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 13:34                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-23 13:50                     ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 13:54                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-23 14:51                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-23 15:02                           ` Chuck Lever
2012-04-23 15:23                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-23 17:45                               ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-23 15:16                           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 15:28                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-23 18:59                               ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-20 21:13       ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 14:55         ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-23 15:32           ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 18:06             ` Steve Dickson
2012-04-23 18:33               ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 20:38               ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-24 14:50                 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-24 15:54                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-24 16:34                     ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-25  9:41                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-04-25 12:04                         ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-23 17:43           ` Peter Staubach
2012-04-23 19:06           ` Malahal Naineni
2012-04-22  4:16     ` Ric Wheeler
2012-04-23 11:20       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1334749927-26138-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malahal@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=michael.brantley@deshaw.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=pstaubach@exagrid.com \
    --cc=rees@umich.edu \
    --cc=sven.breuner@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®