RE: [PATCH] sched: Enable arch-specific asym packing option in sched domain

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:18 -0700, Diwakar Tundlam wrote:
> 
> arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing() is already present under ifdef CONFIG_SMT.
> I didn't touch that. I only added it to SD_CPU_INIT for all cpu's.
> I assumed Power7 shouldn't use SD_CPU_INIT.

All archs use SD_CPU_INIT, its the default topology level for a
package/socket. So now you've made Power7 prefer lower numbered sockets
over higher numbered sockets.. not fatal, but not really nice either.

[ power7 is the only one that implements arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing ]

> Maybe I should define a separate weak symbol, say arch_sd_bias_to_lower_num_cpu()?
> Then Power7 can define arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing() to be '1' and it will not
> break all-cpu init.

A slightly saner name would be:

  arch_sd_package_asym_packing()

FWIW, I suspect you're wanting to use this for some ARM chip (nvidia
doesn't do much else -- aside from this graphics stuff) so that if
there's hardly anything it runs on cpu0. Now, last time I checked, these
ARM things had only 1 package, so I still don't see the point :-)

I suspect you want to modify SD_MC_INIT() with something like:

  arch_sd_mc_asym_packing()

Or is this the big-little thing and you're representing them as separate
packages?

See how a little extra information avoids me having to endlessly second
guess wtf you're actually wanting to do?