From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>
Cc: "'Peter Zijlstra'" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"'Christoph Lameter'" <cl@gentwo.org>,
"'Michael Neuling'" <mikey@neuling.org>,
"'Stephen Rothwell'" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"'Benjamin Herrenschmidt'" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"'David Rientjes'" <rientjes@google.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Enable arch-specific asym packing option in sched domain
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:55:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336175718.16162.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF103@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com>
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 16:18 -0700, Diwakar Tundlam wrote:
> Yes, this is for Nvidia's ARM Quad-core Tegra CPU. It is a single package, organized flatly.
> To save power, we want cores to be loaded up in order from cpu0, 1, etc.
> The ASYM_PACKING flag seems to do exactly what we need if set in the domain flag.
Diwakar, But ASYM_PACKING will lead to more task migrations and also it
relies on the periodic load balancing to correct it.
Perhaps we should expose this info more natively and prefer the lower
siblings during task wakeup etc. And perhaps be more aggressive in
moving the load to lower siblings etc.
Can you elaborate more about the power-saving scenario and what causes
the power-savings etc to better understand the problem.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 20:28 Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-04 21:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 22:06 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-04 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 22:18 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-04 22:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 23:18 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-04 23:20 ` Michael Neuling
2012-05-04 23:25 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-04 23:41 ` Michael Neuling
2012-05-07 2:59 ` Michael Wang
2012-05-04 23:55 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2012-05-05 20:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-07 17:25 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-08 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 22:47 ` Michael Neuling
2012-05-04 22:51 ` Michael Neuling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336175718.16162.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dtundlam@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®