Re: [PATCH 6/6] xen: x86 pvh: use XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range for foreign gmfn mappings

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 00:57 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:32:12 +0100
> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Squeezing the necessary fields into the existing XENMEM_add_to_physmap
> > interface was proving to be a bit tricky so we have decided to go with
> > a new interface upstream (the XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign interface using
> > XENMEM_add_to_physmap was never committed anywhere). This interface
> > also allows for batching which was impossible to support at the same
> > time as foreign mfns in the old interface.
> > 
> > This reverts the relevant parts of "PVH: basic and header changes,
> > elfnote changes, ..." and followups and trivially converts
> > pvh_add_to_xen_p2m over.
> 
> 
> Hmm... I don't see xen side implementation of XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range,

I said in the 0/6 patch, but should have repeated here:

        The final patch requires that XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range be implemented
        for x86 on the hypervisor side. For inspiration the ARM version can be
        found at <1350314444-17148-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
        (and will likely be in xen-unstable soon).

In the end I checked it in yesterday.

> and since I've already got my patches tested and cut, I'm going to send
> them now. We can apply this change easily in konrad's tree.

Sure, no problem.

Ian.