* [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() @ 2012-11-19 6:43 Huang Shijie 2012-11-19 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device() Huang Shijie 2012-11-30 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Artem Bityutskiy 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Huang Shijie @ 2012-11-19 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dwmw2; +Cc: dedekind1, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, Huang Shijie The nand_get_device() does not select the chip, but nand_release_device() does de-select the chip. It is really strange. With the current code, nand_sync() will de-select the chip, even if the chip has never been selected. To make the balance of select/de-select chip, it's better to remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() which makes the code more clear. Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 6eef7fb..861a87d 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -130,15 +130,12 @@ static int check_offs_len(struct mtd_info *mtd, * nand_release_device - [GENERIC] release chip * @mtd: MTD device structure * - * Deselect, release chip lock and wake up anyone waiting on the device. + * Release chip lock and wake up anyone waiting on the device. */ static void nand_release_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) { struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; - /* De-select the NAND device */ - chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); - /* Release the controller and the chip */ spin_lock(&chip->controller->lock); chip->controller->active = NULL; @@ -333,8 +330,10 @@ static int nand_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, int getchip) i++; } while (!res && i < 2 && (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_SCAN2NDPAGE)); - if (getchip) + if (getchip) { + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); nand_release_device(mtd); + } return res; } @@ -952,6 +951,7 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) ret = __nand_unlock(mtd, ofs, len, 0); out: + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); nand_release_device(mtd); return ret; @@ -1016,6 +1016,7 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) ret = __nand_unlock(mtd, ofs, len, 0x1); out: + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); nand_release_device(mtd); return ret; @@ -1552,6 +1553,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr); } } + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); ops->retlen = ops->len - (size_t) readlen; if (oob) @@ -1806,6 +1808,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr); } } + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); ops->oobretlen = ops->ooblen - readlen; @@ -2188,8 +2191,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr); /* Check, if it is write protected */ - if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) - return -EIO; + if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) { + ret = -EIO; + goto err_out; + } realpage = (int)(to >> chip->page_shift); page = realpage & chip->pagemask; @@ -2201,8 +2206,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, chip->pagebuf = -1; /* Don't allow multipage oob writes with offset */ - if (oob && ops->ooboffs && (ops->ooboffs + ops->ooblen > oobmaxlen)) - return -EINVAL; + if (oob && ops->ooboffs && (ops->ooboffs + ops->ooblen > oobmaxlen)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto err_out; + } while (1) { int bytes = mtd->writesize; @@ -2253,6 +2260,9 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, ops->retlen = ops->len - writelen; if (unlikely(oob)) ops->oobretlen = ops->ooblen; + +err_out: + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); return ret; } @@ -2379,8 +2389,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET, -1, -1); /* Check, if it is write protected */ - if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) + if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) { + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); return -EROFS; + } /* Invalidate the page cache, if we write to the cached page */ if (page == chip->pagebuf) @@ -2393,6 +2405,8 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, else status = chip->ecc.write_oob(mtd, chip, page & chip->pagemask); + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); + if (status) return status; @@ -2625,6 +2639,7 @@ erase_exit: ret = instr->state == MTD_ERASE_DONE ? 0 : -EIO; /* Deselect and wake up anyone waiting on the device */ + chip->select_chip(mtd, -1); nand_release_device(mtd); /* Do call back function */ -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mtd: remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device() 2012-11-19 6:43 [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Huang Shijie @ 2012-11-19 6:43 ` Huang Shijie 2012-11-30 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Artem Bityutskiy 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Huang Shijie @ 2012-11-19 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dwmw2; +Cc: dedekind1, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, Huang Shijie There are two reasons to remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device(): [1] The nand_release_device() does not have the "chip" parameter. [2] We can get the nand_chip by the mtd->priv field. This patch removes the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device(). Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 37 ++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 861a87d..55c2883 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_128 = { .length = 78} } }; -static int nand_get_device(struct nand_chip *chip, struct mtd_info *mtd, - int new_state); +static int nand_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int new_state); static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, struct mtd_oob_ops *ops); @@ -300,7 +299,7 @@ static int nand_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, int getchip) if (getchip) { chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift); - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_READING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_READING); /* Select the NAND device */ chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr); @@ -382,7 +381,7 @@ static int nand_default_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs) struct mtd_oob_ops ops; loff_t wr_ofs = ofs; - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_WRITING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_WRITING); ops.datbuf = NULL; ops.oobbuf = buf; @@ -749,15 +748,15 @@ static void panic_nand_get_device(struct nand_chip *chip, /** * nand_get_device - [GENERIC] Get chip for selected access - * @chip: the nand chip descriptor * @mtd: MTD device structure * @new_state: the state which is requested * * Get the device and lock it for exclusive access */ static int -nand_get_device(struct nand_chip *chip, struct mtd_info *mtd, int new_state) +nand_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int new_state) { + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; spinlock_t *lock = &chip->controller->lock; wait_queue_head_t *wq = &chip->controller->wq; DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); @@ -933,7 +932,7 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) if (ofs + len == mtd->size) len -= mtd->erasesize; - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_UNLOCKING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_UNLOCKING); /* Shift to get chip number */ chipnr = ofs >> chip->chip_shift; @@ -983,7 +982,7 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) if (check_offs_len(mtd, ofs, len)) ret = -EINVAL; - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_LOCKING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_LOCKING); /* Shift to get chip number */ chipnr = ofs >> chip->chip_shift; @@ -1581,11 +1580,10 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, static int nand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len, size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; struct mtd_oob_ops ops; int ret; - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_READING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_READING); ops.len = len; ops.datbuf = buf; ops.oobbuf = NULL; @@ -1832,7 +1830,6 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, static int nand_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, struct mtd_oob_ops *ops) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; int ret = -ENOTSUPP; ops->retlen = 0; @@ -1844,7 +1841,7 @@ static int nand_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, return -EINVAL; } - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_READING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_READING); switch (ops->mode) { case MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB: @@ -2314,11 +2311,10 @@ static int panic_nand_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, static int nand_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, size_t *retlen, const uint8_t *buf) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; struct mtd_oob_ops ops; int ret; - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_WRITING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_WRITING); ops.len = len; ops.datbuf = (uint8_t *)buf; ops.oobbuf = NULL; @@ -2424,7 +2420,6 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, static int nand_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, struct mtd_oob_ops *ops) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; int ret = -ENOTSUPP; ops->retlen = 0; @@ -2436,7 +2431,7 @@ static int nand_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, return -EINVAL; } - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_WRITING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_WRITING); switch (ops->mode) { case MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB: @@ -2529,7 +2524,7 @@ int nand_erase_nand(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr, return -EINVAL; /* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */ - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_ERASING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_ERASING); /* Shift to get first page */ page = (int)(instr->addr >> chip->page_shift); @@ -2675,12 +2670,10 @@ erase_exit: */ static void nand_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; - pr_debug("%s: called\n", __func__); /* Grab the lock and see if the device is available */ - nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_SYNCING); + nand_get_device(mtd, FL_SYNCING); /* Release it and go back */ nand_release_device(mtd); } @@ -2766,9 +2759,7 @@ static int nand_onfi_get_features(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, */ static int nand_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; - - return nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_PM_SUSPENDED); + return nand_get_device(mtd, FL_PM_SUSPENDED); } /** -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() 2012-11-19 6:43 [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Huang Shijie 2012-11-19 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device() Huang Shijie @ 2012-11-30 10:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-11-30 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Huang Shijie; +Cc: dwmw2, linux-mtd, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 589 bytes --] On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 14:43 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > The nand_get_device() does not select the chip, but nand_release_device() > does de-select the chip. It is really strange. > > With the current code, nand_sync() will de-select the chip, even if the chip > has never been selected. > > To make the balance of select/de-select chip, it's better to remove the > de-select chip code in nand_release_device() which makes the code more > clear. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-30 10:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-11-19 6:43 [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Huang Shijie 2012-11-19 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device() Huang Shijie 2012-11-30 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Artem Bityutskiy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®