From: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] posix-cpu-timers: timer functions must use timer time instead of clock time
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:17:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367291838-5490-8-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367291838-5490-1-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
For process timer, we use cpu_clock_sample_group() and cpu_timer_sample_group()
correctly. However for thread timer, we always use cpu_clock_sample().
That's wrong becuase cpu_clock_sample() account uncommited delta_exec too. And
this is inconsistency against run_posix_cpu_tiemrs().
This is not big matter because a following workaround code in
posix_cpu_timer_get() hides the timer miscalculation issue. However it makes
wrong rq lock held and would be better to fix.
if (cpu_time_before(timer->it_clock, now, timer->it.cpu.expires)) {
...
} else {
/*
* The timer should have expired already, but the firing
* hasn't taken place yet. Say it's just about to expire.
*/
itp->it_value.tv_nsec = 1;
itp->it_value.tv_sec = 0;
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 98f354e..c69b8d8 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -204,11 +204,10 @@ posix_cpu_clock_set(const clockid_t which_clock, const struct timespec *tp)
}
-/*
- * Sample a per-thread clock for the given task.
- */
-static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
- union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+static int do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(const clockid_t which_clock,
+ struct task_struct *p,
+ bool add_delta,
+ union cpu_time_count *cpu)
{
switch (CPUCLOCK_WHICH(which_clock)) {
default:
@@ -220,12 +219,30 @@ static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
cpu->cpu = virt_ticks(p);
break;
case CPUCLOCK_SCHED:
- cpu->sched = task_sched_runtime(p, true);
+ cpu->sched = task_sched_runtime(p, add_delta);
break;
}
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Sample a per-thread clock for the given task.
+ */
+static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
+ union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+{
+ return do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(which_clock, p, true, cpu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Sample a per-thread timer clock for the given task.
+ */
+static int cpu_timer_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
+ union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+{
+ return do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(which_clock, p, false, cpu);
+}
+
static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime *a, struct task_cputime *b)
{
if (b->utime > a->utime)
@@ -700,7 +717,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
* check if it's already passed. In short, we need a sample.
*/
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
- cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
+ cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
} else {
cpu_timer_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
}
@@ -756,7 +773,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
* we need exact current time.
*/
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
- now = val;
+ cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
else
cpu_clock_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
cpu_time_add(timer->it_clock, &new_expires, now);
@@ -844,7 +861,7 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec *itp)
* Sample the clock to take the difference with the expiry time.
*/
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
- cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
+ cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
clear_dead = p->exit_state;
} else {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -1168,7 +1185,7 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_schedule(struct k_itimer *timer)
* Fetch the current sample and update the timer's expiry time.
*/
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
- cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
+ cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
if (unlikely(p->exit_state)) {
clear_dead_task(timer, now);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-30 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 3:17 [PATCH v3 0/7] posix-cpu-timers fixlet kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] events: Protect access via task_subsys_state_check() kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] vm: add no-mmu vm_iomap_memory() stub kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: make 'ocp2scp_usb_phy_phy_48m" as the main clock kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] posix-cpu-timers: don't account cpu timer after stopped thread runtime accounting kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] posix-cpu-timers: fix acounting delta_exec twice kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] posix-cpu-timers: fix wrong timer initialization kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 13:34 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-30 3:17 ` kosaki.motohiro [this message]
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] posix-cpu-timers: check_thread_timers() uses task_sched_runtime() kosaki.motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched: task_sched_runtime introduce micro optimization kosaki.motohiro
2013-05-01 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 11:50 ` Paul Turner
2013-05-01 18:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 18:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-30 3:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] posix-cpu-timers: cleanup cpu_{clock,timer}_sample{,_group} kosaki.motohiro
2013-05-01 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] posix-cpu-timers fixlet Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367291838-5490-8-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=olivier@trillion01.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®