mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only
@ 2013-10-08 14:01 Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: " Laxman Dewangan
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2013-10-08 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: broonie; +Cc: lgirdwood, swarren, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan

As per the devicetree binding document of TPS65090, the "regulators"
subnode should be under the parent node, not outside of parent node.
Hence to get the regulator node, the correct call is
of_get_child_by_name() rather than of_find_node_by_name() which searches
the "regulators" node from the parent node to end of DTS file.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index bd611cd..676f755 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data(
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	regulators = of_find_node_by_name(np, "regulators");
+	regulators = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
 	if (!regulators) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "regulator node not found\n");
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
-- 
1.7.1.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: get regulators node from parent node only
  2013-10-08 14:01 [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only Laxman Dewangan
@ 2013-10-08 14:01 ` Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: " Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-09 17:51 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: " Mark Brown
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2013-10-08 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: broonie; +Cc: lgirdwood, swarren, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan

As per the devicetree binding document of TPS6586x, the "regulators"
subnode should be under the parent node, not outside of parent node.
Hence to get the regulator node, the correct call is
of_get_child_by_name() rather than of_find_node_by_name() which searches
the "regulators" node from the parent node to end of DTS file.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
index 45e5d68..e8e3a8a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static struct tps6586x_platform_data *tps6586x_parse_regulator_dt(
 	struct tps6586x_platform_data *pdata;
 	int err;
 
-	regs = of_find_node_by_name(np, "regulators");
+	regs = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
 	if (!regs) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "regulator node not found\n");
 		return NULL;
-- 
1.7.1.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: get regulators node from parent node only
  2013-10-08 14:01 [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: " Laxman Dewangan
@ 2013-10-08 14:01 ` Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-09 17:51 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: " Mark Brown
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2013-10-08 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: broonie; +Cc: lgirdwood, swarren, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan

As per the devicetree binding document of TPS65910, the "regulators"
subnode should be under the parent node, not outside of parent node.
Hence to get the regulator node, the correct call is
of_get_child_by_name() rather than of_find_node_by_name() which searches
the "regulators" node from the parent node to end of DTS file.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
index b8167df..ccde074 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt_reg_data(
 	}
 
 	np = of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
-	regulators = of_find_node_by_name(np, "regulators");
+	regulators = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
 	if (!regulators) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "regulator node not found\n");
 		return NULL;
-- 
1.7.1.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only
  2013-10-08 14:01 [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: " Laxman Dewangan
  2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: " Laxman Dewangan
@ 2013-10-09 17:51 ` Mark Brown
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-10-09 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laxman Dewangan; +Cc: lgirdwood, swarren, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:31:02PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> As per the devicetree binding document of TPS65090, the "regulators"
> subnode should be under the parent node, not outside of parent node.
> Hence to get the regulator node, the correct call is
> of_get_child_by_name() rather than of_find_node_by_name() which searches
> the "regulators" node from the parent node to end of DTS file.

Applied all, thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-09 17:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-08 14:01 [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: get regulators node from parent node only Laxman Dewangan
2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: " Laxman Dewangan
2013-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: " Laxman Dewangan
2013-10-09 17:51 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65090: " Mark Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®