mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Honestly, fork systemd
@ 2014-02-16 15:00 redlynx
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redlynx @ 2014-02-16 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

The alternative is allready here. It's called SysV. Nothing needs to be done.
It is a rock on which to build.
Not a shifting sands.

I must say, I agree with the man of the New Testament on this particular
sort of issue. Build your house on rock, not on sand.

The alternative is allready in all of our laps, you're just trying
to take away what we allready posess. It is theft of a sort.

>>On 16/02/14 09:54, ChaosEsque Team wrote:
>> Isn't it great that we have to have this discussion about forking debian
>> because within an oligarchic 8 man planning committee, which
>> was split 50/50 for and against systemd, the chairman happened to
>> be a systemd fan and abused his position to gain a double
>> vote for forcing systemd down out knecks?
>
>Whatever it is you are trying to say, what difference will it make if
>you keep sending these emails without doing any actual work to code an
>alternative?
>
>Do you think an alternative is going to just fall out of the sky?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Honestly, fork systemd
@ 2014-02-16 15:02 redlynx
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redlynx @ 2014-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rms

No, I will not be converted to systemd just because a few dictators
made a decision.*

This needs to be overturned by whoever actually runs the debian
non-profit corporation. I'm sure the tech-ctte isn't the board of directors.


"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. 26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it."


BDale has no right to make this decision for the rest of us.
But that is just what he did.

The tech-ctte has no right to dictate that we all change
the way we use linux on debian, but that's what four of them did.

*And no one else who is opposed to systemd should accept this either.

Debian is the Universal Operating System.
It is not BDale's OS. It is not Matthias OS. It is not Adrian OS.
It is not Lennart OS.

It is our operating system.
Your four supporters have absolutly no right changing it from
a unix system to a systemD operating system.

You have no right at all.
And you need to be fought and stopped.

>If you insist on alegories, then the choice now stands between
>building on a solitary rock in the middle of a stormy sea or building
>on the sandy beaches of a popular costal town. Often it is easier to
>put in the work to drive down piles trought the sand down to bedrock
>and injecting some concrete where needed to form your own rock
>foundation rather than transport everything to that rocky island. And
>the end result for the users is a much more useful home.
>
>The choice in Debian has been made - we like the beachfront property.
>Help us make the best of it - investigate where the sand is weakest
>and inject concrete there, find the bedrock and drive some piles to
>it, add liquifaction protection where that is needed, be constructive.
>The house will be build here. If you can help its construction and
>help it be stronger - please help. If you are going to continue
>advocating not building here - please don't. That one is settled.
>
>I personally dislike systemd on a few technical and few social
>grounds, but I respect the decision of Debian TC and will do what I
>can to make systemd in Debian be the bast it can be and make Debian
>with systemd the strongest system it can be. I hope others will do the
>same.
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
>    Aigars Mahinovs        mailto:aigarius@debian.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Honestly, fork systemd
@ 2014-02-16 15:51 lynxred
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: lynxred @ 2014-02-16 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, debian-devel

No, I will not be converted to systemd just because a few dictators
made a decision.

This needs to be overturned by whoever actually runs the debian
non-profit corporation. I'm sure the tech-ctte isn't the board of
directors.
"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be
like a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell,
and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it
did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. 26 And everyone
who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a
foolish man who built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and
the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and
it fell, and great was the fall of it."
BDale has no right to make this decision for the rest of us.
But that is just what he did.

The tech-ctte has no right to dictate that we all change
the way we use linux on debian, but that's what four of them did.

*And no one else who is opposed to systemd should accept this either.

Debian is the Universal Operating System.
It is not BDale's OS. It is not Matthias OS. It is not Adrian OS.
It is not Lennart OS.

It is our operating system.
Your four supporters have absolutly no right changing it from
a unix system to a systemD operating system.

You have no right at all.
And you need to be fought and stopped.

>If you insist on alegories, then the choice now stands between
>building on a solitary rock in the middle of a stormy sea or building
>on the sandy beaches of a popular costal town. Often it is easier to
>put in the work to drive down piles trought the sand down to bedrock
>and injecting some concrete where needed to form your own rock
>foundation rather than transport everything to that rocky island. And
>the end result for the users is a much more useful home. > >The
choice in Debian has been made - we like the beachfront property.
>Help us make the best of it - investigate where the sand is weakest
>and inject concrete there, find the bedrock and drive some piles to
>it, add liquifaction protection where that is needed, be
constructive. 
>The house will be build here. If you can help its construction and 
>help it be stronger - please help. If you are going
to continue 
>advocating not building here - please don't. That one is
settled.
 >I personally dislike systemd on a few technical and few
social 
>grounds, but I respect the decision of Debian TC and will do
what I 
>can to make systemd in Debian be the bast it can be and make
Debian 
>with systemd the strongest system it can be. I hope others
will do the same. 
>Best regards,
>    Aigars Mahinovs
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-16 19:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20140216123432.34BC8200F5@smtp.hushmail.com>
2014-02-16 13:21 ` Honestly, fork systemd Aigars Mahinovs
2014-02-16 19:51   ` ChaosEsque Team
2014-02-16 15:00 redlynx
2014-02-16 15:02 redlynx
2014-02-16 15:51 lynxred

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome