mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:39:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394707143.25873.30.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394142511-14827-9-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>

On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> @@ -557,12 +577,25 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif)
>  void xenvif_free(struct xenvif *vif)
>  {
>  	int i, unmap_timeout = 0;
> +	/* Here we want to avoid timeout messages if an skb can be legitimatly

"legitimately"

> +	 * stucked somewhere else. Realisticly this could be an another vif's

"stuck" and "Realistically"

> +	 * internal or QDisc queue. That another vif also has this
> +	 * rx_drain_timeout_msecs timeout, but the timer only ditches the
> +	 * internal queue. After that, the QDisc queue can put in worst case
> +	 * XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE / MAX_SKB_FRAGS skbs into that another vif's
> +	 * internal queue, so we need several rounds of such timeouts until we
> +	 * can be sure that no another vif should have skb's from us. We are
> +	 * not sending more skb's, so newly stucked packets are not interesting

"stuck" again.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 560950e..bb65c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,13 @@ module_param(separate_tx_rx_irq, bool, 0644);
>  static unsigned int fatal_skb_slots = FATAL_SKB_SLOTS_DEFAULT;
>  module_param(fatal_skb_slots, uint, 0444);
>  
> +/* When guest ring is filled up, qdisc queues the packets for us, but we have
> + * to timeout them, otherwise other guests' packets can get stucked there

"stuck"

Ian.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-13 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 21:48 [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/9] xen-netback: Use skb->cb for pending_idx Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/9] xen-netback: Minor refactoring of netback code Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/9] xen-netback: Handle foreign mapped pages on the guest RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:17   ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 12:34     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:33   ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:56     ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-03-13 11:02       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 11:09         ` David Vrabel
2014-03-13 11:13         ` Wei Liu
2014-03-13 13:17     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 13:56       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 17:43         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:39   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-19 21:16   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-20  9:53     ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 10:48     ` Wei Liu
2014-03-20 11:14       ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 12:38         ` Wei Liu
2014-03-20 16:11           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-07 21:05 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy David Miller
2014-03-08 14:37   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-08 23:57     ` David Miller
2014-03-10 10:15       ` Wei Liu
2014-03-12 15:40       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 18:49         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:43         ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 18:23   ` Zoltan Kiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1394707143.25873.30.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®