From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:38:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140320123839.GK16807@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD0292550@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:14:51AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@citrix.com]
> > Sent: 20 March 2014 10:49
> > To: Zoltan Kiss
> > Cc: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> > netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies;
> > Paul Durrant
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap
> > operations
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:16:05PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm thinking about revoking this patch: it's value is pretty small,
> > > but it causes performance regression on Win7 guests. And probably it
> > > is not the best solution for this problem. It might be the delay it
> > > takes the dealloc thread to be scheduled is enough.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> >
> > Can you elaborate? What makes Win7 so special? What's performance
> > impact to other guests?
> >
>
> It won't be Win7 specifically I expect. It will likely by any version
> of Windows, or any other OS that limits the TXs-in-flight so
> aggressively. Basically you need to TX-complete reasonably frequently
> otherwise your throughput drops off a lot. IIRC at Solarflare we found
> every ~500us to be just about frequent enough for hitting 10G.
Thanks for the explanation.
Reverting this change basically means when to flush TLB is at sole
discretion of Linux kernel scheduler. I don't oppose to that. But it
would be better to provide some numbers.
Wei.
>
> Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 21:48 [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/9] xen-netback: Use skb->cb for pending_idx Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/9] xen-netback: Minor refactoring of netback code Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/9] xen-netback: Handle foreign mapped pages on the guest RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:17 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 12:34 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:56 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-03-13 11:02 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 11:09 ` David Vrabel
2014-03-13 11:13 ` Wei Liu
2014-03-13 13:17 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 13:56 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 17:43 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-19 21:16 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-20 9:53 ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 10:48 ` Wei Liu
2014-03-20 11:14 ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 12:38 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2014-03-20 16:11 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-07 21:05 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy David Miller
2014-03-08 14:37 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-08 23:57 ` David Miller
2014-03-10 10:15 ` Wei Liu
2014-03-12 15:40 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 18:49 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:43 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 18:23 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140320123839.GK16807@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Davies@citrix.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®