mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10 V2] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:56:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399877792-13046-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399877792-13046-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Since destroy_worker() doesn't need to sleep nor require manager_mutex,
destroy_worker() can be directly called in the idle timeout
handler, it helps us remove POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS and
maybe_destroy_worker() and simplify the manage_workers()

After POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS is removed, worker_thread() doesn't
need to test whether it needs to manage after processed works.
So we can remove the test branch.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   69 ++++------------------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 465e751..95695c3 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ enum {
 	 * manager_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
 	 * create_worker() is in progress.
 	 */
-	POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS	= 1 << 0,	/* need to manage workers */
 	POOL_DISASSOCIATED	= 1 << 2,	/* cpu can't serve workers */
 	POOL_FREEZING		= 1 << 3,	/* freeze in progress */
 
@@ -752,13 +751,6 @@ static bool need_to_create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	return need_more_worker(pool) && !may_start_working(pool);
 }
 
-/* Do I need to be the manager? */
-static bool need_to_manage_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
-{
-	return need_to_create_worker(pool) ||
-		(pool->flags & POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS);
-}
-
 /* Do we have too many workers and should some go away? */
 static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
@@ -1867,8 +1859,7 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
 	struct worker_pool *pool = (void *)__pool;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-
-	if (too_many_workers(pool)) {
+	while (too_many_workers(pool)) {
 		struct worker *worker;
 		unsigned long expires;
 
@@ -1876,15 +1867,13 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
 		worker = list_entry(pool->idle_list.prev, struct worker, entry);
 		expires = worker->last_active + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT;
 
-		if (time_before(jiffies, expires))
+		if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) {
 			mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, expires);
-		else {
-			/* it's been idle for too long, wake up manager */
-			pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS;
-			wake_up_worker(pool);
+			break;
 		}
-	}
 
+		destroy_worker(worker);
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 }
 
@@ -2001,44 +1990,6 @@ restart:
 }
 
 /**
- * maybe_destroy_worker - destroy workers which have been idle for a while
- * @pool: pool to destroy workers for
- *
- * Destroy @pool workers which have been idle for longer than
- * IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT.
- *
- * LOCKING:
- * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which may be released and regrabbed
- * multiple times.  Called only from manager.
- *
- * Return:
- * %false if no action was taken and pool->lock stayed locked, %true
- * otherwise.
- */
-static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
-{
-	bool ret = false;
-
-	while (too_many_workers(pool)) {
-		struct worker *worker;
-		unsigned long expires;
-
-		worker = list_entry(pool->idle_list.prev, struct worker, entry);
-		expires = worker->last_active + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT;
-
-		if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) {
-			mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, expires);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		destroy_worker(worker);
-		ret = true;
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
  * manage_workers - manage worker pool
  * @worker: self
  *
@@ -2101,13 +2052,6 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
 		ret = true;
 	}
 
-	pool->flags &= ~POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS;
-
-	/*
-	 * Destroy and then create so that may_start_working() is true
-	 * on return.
-	 */
-	ret |= maybe_destroy_workers(pool);
 	ret |= maybe_create_worker(pool);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
@@ -2349,9 +2293,6 @@ recheck:
 
 	worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false);
 sleep:
-	if (unlikely(need_to_manage_workers(pool)) && manage_workers(worker))
-		goto recheck;
-
 	/*
 	 * pool->lock is held and there's no work to process and no need to
 	 * manage, sleep.  Workers are woken up only while holding
-- 
1.7.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-12  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-27  4:08 [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:01   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:43     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:13   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:58     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:31   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:02   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:27     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:31       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07  7:30   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:15     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:36   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07  7:10     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:12       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 13:38         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:41           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 15:30             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 15:37               ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:57   ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:59   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:33     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:35       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:38         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to bind_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-binding code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:54   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:05 ` [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56   ` [PATCH 00/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 01/10 V2] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 02/10 V2] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:08       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:08         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 03/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:20       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:32         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:14           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20  9:54             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-05-12 21:26       ` [PATCH 04/10 V2] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 05/10 V2] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:35       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 21:37       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 06/10 V2] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:40       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:43         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:17           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 07/10 V2] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 08/10 V2] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 22:01       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:45         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:19           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 09/10 V2] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 10/10 V2] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 22:05       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:55         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46     ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 14:22         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:23         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:24         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 10/10] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 15:00       ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1399877792-13046-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®