From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10 V2] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:56:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399877792-13046-9-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399877792-13046-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
manager_mutex is only used to protect the attaching for the pool
and the pool->workers list. It protects the pool->workers and operations
based on this list, such as:
cpu-binding for the workers in the pool->workers
concurrency management for the workers in the pool->workers
So we can simply rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex without any
functionality changed.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/workqueue_internal.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 663de70..e6d9725 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
* be executing on any CPU. The pool behaves as an unbound one.
*
* Note that DISASSOCIATED should be flipped only while holding
- * manager_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
+ * attach_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
* create_worker() is in progress.
*/
POOL_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 2, /* cpu can't serve workers */
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ enum {
* cpu or grabbing pool->lock is enough for read access. If
* POOL_DISASSOCIATED is set, it's identical to L.
*
- * M: pool->manager_mutex protected.
+ * A: pool->attach_mutex protected.
*
* PL: wq_pool_mutex protected.
*
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
/* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */
- struct mutex manager_mutex; /* manager exclusion */
- struct list_head workers; /* M: attached workers */
+ struct mutex attach_mutex; /* attach/detach exclusion */
+ struct list_head workers; /* A: attached workers */
struct completion *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */
struct ida worker_ida; /* worker IDs for task name */
@@ -1681,11 +1681,11 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker,
{
struct completion *detach_completion = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
list_del(&worker->node);
if (list_empty(&pool->workers))
detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (detach_completion)
complete(detach_completion);
@@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
/* prevent userland from meddling with cpumask of workqueue workers */
worker->task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any
@@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
/*
- * The pool->manager_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED
+ * The pool->attach_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED
* remains stable across this function. See the comments above the
* flag definition for details.
*/
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
/* successful, attach the worker to the pool */
list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
return worker;
@@ -3439,7 +3439,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
(unsigned long)pool);
mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb);
- mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&pool->attach_mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->workers);
ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
@@ -3505,10 +3505,10 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle);
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (!list_empty(&pool->workers))
pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->detach_completion)
wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion);
@@ -4495,11 +4495,11 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
/*
- * We've blocked all manager operations. Make all workers
+ * We've blocked all attach/detach operations. Make all workers
* unbound and set DISASSOCIATED. Before this, all workers
* except for the ones which are still executing works from
* before the last CPU down must be on the cpu. After
@@ -4511,7 +4511,7 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* Call schedule() so that we cross rq->lock and thus can
@@ -4552,7 +4552,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
struct worker *worker;
- lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex);
/*
* Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should
@@ -4620,7 +4620,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
static cpumask_t cpumask;
struct worker *worker;
- lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex);
/* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask))
@@ -4665,7 +4665,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
@@ -4677,7 +4677,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
}
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
}
/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
index c44abc3..2acb41b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct worker {
struct task_struct *task; /* I: worker task */
struct worker_pool *pool; /* I: the associated pool */
/* L: for rescuers */
- struct list_head node; /* M: attached to the pool */
+ struct list_head node; /* A: attached to the pool */
unsigned long last_active; /* L: last active timestamp */
unsigned int flags; /* X: flags */
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-27 4:08 [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:01 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:58 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:31 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:02 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:27 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 7:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27 4:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:36 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 7:10 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 13:38 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:41 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 15:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to bind_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-binding code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27 4:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:05 ` [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 00/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 01/10 V2] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 02/10 V2] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:08 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13 6:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 03/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:20 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13 6:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:14 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 9:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 04/10 V2] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:26 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 05/10 V2] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 21:37 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 06/10 V2] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13 6:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 07/10 V2] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-05-12 22:01 ` [PATCH 08/10 V2] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Tejun Heo
2014-05-13 6:45 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 09/10 V2] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 6:56 ` [PATCH 10/10 V2] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13 6:55 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 14:22 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:23 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 9:46 ` [PATCH V3 10/10] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 15:00 ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399877792-13046-9-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®