From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, apw@canonical.com, tytso@mit.edu,
dwalter@google.com, neilb@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:57:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405695433.14358.40.camel@joe-AO725> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718144920.GE31270@pd.tnic>
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:35:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Using the one-liner above also makes it harder to
> > automate checkpatch neatening and avoid using Lindent:
>
> automated checkpatch?? More idiocy... we want less, in case you've
> forgotten.
"we" is a subset of "all of us".
> <snip more pointless justification attempts>
Those are not at all pointless if you intend to fix
any issue found by the tool.
I think your viewpoint is a bit tainted as you're the
same guy that wrote "fuck readability".
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/19/116
> It is about time people understood that and dropped the senseless frenzy
> of creating patches with less time spent on thinking about them than
> preparing them.
I suggest you try writing some documentation
patches instead of acrid emails.
cheers, Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 15:34 Richard Weinberger
2014-07-17 15:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-17 15:51 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-17 16:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-17 16:24 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-22 5:27 ` Kalle Valo
2014-08-04 14:30 ` Pavel Machek
2014-07-17 22:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-18 7:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 8:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 13:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 13:46 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 13:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 14:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-18 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:17 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-18 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:35 ` Joe Perches
2014-07-18 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 14:57 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2014-07-18 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405695433.14358.40.camel@joe-AO725 \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dwalter@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®