* [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix to cover sentry_lock for block allocation
@ 2015-03-17 16:57 Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated Jaegeuk Kim
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
In the following call stack, f2fs changes the bitmap for dirty segments and # of
dirty sentries without grabbing sit_i->sentry_lock.
This can result in mismatch on bitmap and # of dirty sentries, since if there
are some direct_io operations.
In allocate_data_block,
- __allocate_new_segments
- mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
- s_ops->allocate_segment
- new_curseg/change_curseg
- reset_curseg
- __set_sit_entry_type
- __mark_sit_entry_dirty
- set_bit(dirty_sentries_bitmap)
- dirty_sentries++;
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 3e80bd6..eafaf72 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,7 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
/* direct_io'ed data is aligned to the segment for better performance */
if (direct_io && curseg->next_blkoff)
@@ -1181,7 +1182,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
*/
__add_sum_entry(sbi, type, sum);
- mutex_lock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
__refresh_next_blkoff(sbi, curseg);
stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg);
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
2015-03-17 16:57 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix to cover sentry_lock for block allocation Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-17 16:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-18 2:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
This patch modifies to call set_buffer_new, if new blocks are allocated.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index ba70a78..cefaa67 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ static void f2fs_map_bh(struct super_block *sb, pgoff_t pgofs,
unsigned int blkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits;
size_t count;
- set_buffer_new(bh_result);
map_bh(bh_result, sb, ei->blk + pgofs - ei->fofs);
count = ei->fofs + ei->len - pgofs;
if (count < (UINT_MAX >> blkbits))
@@ -1139,7 +1138,7 @@ static int __get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
goto put_out;
if (dn.data_blkaddr != NULL_ADDR) {
- set_buffer_new(bh_result);
+ clear_buffer_new(bh_result);
map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, dn.data_blkaddr);
} else if (create) {
err = __allocate_data_block(&dn);
@@ -1184,6 +1183,7 @@ get_next:
if (err)
goto sync_out;
allocated = true;
+ set_buffer_new(bh_result);
blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
}
/* Give more consecutive addresses for the readahead */
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance
2015-03-17 16:57 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix to cover sentry_lock for block allocation Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-17 16:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Previously, f2fs_write_data_pages has a mutex, sbi->writepages, to serialize
data writes to maximize write bandwidth, while sacrificing multi-threads
performance.
Practically, however, multi-threads environment is much more important for
users. So this patch tries to remove the mutex.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 7 -------
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 -
fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index cefaa67..1a3d86a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1396,7 +1396,6 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
{
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
- bool locked = false;
int ret;
long diff;
@@ -1417,13 +1416,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
diff = nr_pages_to_write(sbi, DATA, wbc);
- if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
- mutex_lock(&sbi->writepages);
- locked = true;
- }
ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __f2fs_writepage, mapping);
- if (locked)
- mutex_unlock(&sbi->writepages);
f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, DATA, WRITE);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index c1ad404..f2909c6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -604,7 +604,6 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
struct mutex cp_mutex; /* checkpoint procedure lock */
struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
- struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
struct inode_management im[MAX_INO_ENTRY]; /* manage inode cache */
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 0b8a2d8..c9f4aef 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1027,7 +1027,6 @@ try_onemore:
sbi->raw_super = raw_super;
sbi->raw_super_buf = raw_super_buf;
mutex_init(&sbi->gc_mutex);
- mutex_init(&sbi->writepages);
mutex_init(&sbi->cp_mutex);
init_rwsem(&sbi->node_write);
clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
2015-03-17 16:57 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix to cover sentry_lock for block allocation Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-17 16:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-18 1:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
This patch removes wrong f2fs_bug_on in truncate_inline_inode.
When there is no space, it can happen a corner case where i_isze is over
MAX_INLINE_SIZE while its inode is still inline_data.
The scenario is
1. write small data into file #A.
2. fill the whole partition to 100%.
3. truncate 4096 on file #A.
4. write data at 8192 offset.
--> f2fs_write_begin
-> -ENOSPC = f2fs_convert_inline_page
-> f2fs_write_failed
-> truncate_blocks
-> truncate_inline_inode
BUG_ON, since i_size is 4096.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/inline.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index 153c5e7..d3e0599 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ bool truncate_inline_inode(struct page *ipage, u64 from)
{
void *addr;
- /*
- * we should never truncate inline data past max inline data size,
- * because we always convert inline inode to normal one before
- * truncating real data if new size is past max inline data size.
- */
- f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_P_SB(ipage), from > MAX_INLINE_DATA);
-
if (from >= MAX_INLINE_DATA)
return false;
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-18 1:12 ` Chao Yu
2015-03-18 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2015-03-18 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 12:58 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
>
> This patch removes wrong f2fs_bug_on in truncate_inline_inode.
>
> When there is no space, it can happen a corner case where i_isze is over
> MAX_INLINE_SIZE while its inode is still inline_data.
>
> The scenario is
> 1. write small data into file #A.
> 2. fill the whole partition to 100%.
> 3. truncate 4096 on file #A.
If we truncate size over MAX_INLINE_DATA, we will convert inline data in
f2fs_truncate rather than write_begin below. isn't it?
Thanks,
> 4. write data at 8192 offset.
> --> f2fs_write_begin
> -> -ENOSPC = f2fs_convert_inline_page
> -> f2fs_write_failed
> -> truncate_blocks
> -> truncate_inline_inode
> BUG_ON, since i_size is 4096.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/inline.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> index 153c5e7..d3e0599 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> @@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ bool truncate_inline_inode(struct page *ipage, u64 from)
> {
> void *addr;
>
> - /*
> - * we should never truncate inline data past max inline data size,
> - * because we always convert inline inode to normal one before
> - * truncating real data if new size is past max inline data size.
> - */
> - f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_P_SB(ipage), from > MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> -
> if (from >= MAX_INLINE_DATA)
> return false;
>
> --
> 2.1.1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-18 2:24 ` Chao Yu
2015-03-18 17:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2015-03-18 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 12:58 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
>
> This patch modifies to call set_buffer_new, if new blocks are allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index ba70a78..cefaa67 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ static void f2fs_map_bh(struct super_block *sb, pgoff_t pgofs,
> unsigned int blkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits;
> size_t count;
>
> - set_buffer_new(bh_result);
> map_bh(bh_result, sb, ei->blk + pgofs - ei->fofs);
> count = ei->fofs + ei->len - pgofs;
> if (count < (UINT_MAX >> blkbits))
> @@ -1139,7 +1138,7 @@ static int __get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> goto put_out;
>
> if (dn.data_blkaddr != NULL_ADDR) {
> - set_buffer_new(bh_result);
> + clear_buffer_new(bh_result);
Add clear_buffer_new in f2fs_map_bh?
Thanks,
> map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, dn.data_blkaddr);
> } else if (create) {
> err = __allocate_data_block(&dn);
> @@ -1184,6 +1183,7 @@ get_next:
> if (err)
> goto sync_out;
> allocated = true;
> + set_buffer_new(bh_result);
> blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> }
> /* Give more consecutive addresses for the readahead */
> --
> 2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
2015-03-18 2:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2015-03-18 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-19 11:18 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-18 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Chao,
Thanks for the review.
Change log from v1:
o add clear_buffer_new() in f2fs_map_bh
This patch modifies to call set_buffer_new, if new blocks are allocated.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index ba70a78..4a416e7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void f2fs_map_bh(struct super_block *sb, pgoff_t pgofs,
unsigned int blkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits;
size_t count;
- set_buffer_new(bh_result);
+ clear_buffer_new(bh_result);
map_bh(bh_result, sb, ei->blk + pgofs - ei->fofs);
count = ei->fofs + ei->len - pgofs;
if (count < (UINT_MAX >> blkbits))
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
goto put_out;
if (dn.data_blkaddr != NULL_ADDR) {
- set_buffer_new(bh_result);
+ clear_buffer_new(bh_result);
map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, dn.data_blkaddr);
} else if (create) {
err = __allocate_data_block(&dn);
@@ -1184,6 +1184,7 @@ get_next:
if (err)
goto sync_out;
allocated = true;
+ set_buffer_new(bh_result);
blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
}
/* Give more consecutive addresses for the readahead */
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
2015-03-18 1:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2015-03-18 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-19 11:19 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2015-03-18 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:12:00AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 12:58 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
> >
> > This patch removes wrong f2fs_bug_on in truncate_inline_inode.
> >
> > When there is no space, it can happen a corner case where i_isze is over
> > MAX_INLINE_SIZE while its inode is still inline_data.
> >
> > The scenario is
> > 1. write small data into file #A.
> > 2. fill the whole partition to 100%.
> > 3. truncate 4096 on file #A.
>
> If we truncate size over MAX_INLINE_DATA, we will convert inline data in
> f2fs_truncate rather than write_begin below. isn't it?
But, it fails to convert that due to -ENOSPC. :)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> > 4. write data at 8192 offset.
> > --> f2fs_write_begin
> > -> -ENOSPC = f2fs_convert_inline_page
> > -> f2fs_write_failed
> > -> truncate_blocks
> > -> truncate_inline_inode
> > BUG_ON, since i_size is 4096.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/inline.c | 7 -------
> > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > index 153c5e7..d3e0599 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > @@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ bool truncate_inline_inode(struct page *ipage, u64 from)
> > {
> > void *addr;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * we should never truncate inline data past max inline data size,
> > - * because we always convert inline inode to normal one before
> > - * truncating real data if new size is past max inline data size.
> > - */
> > - f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_P_SB(ipage), from > MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> > -
> > if (from >= MAX_INLINE_DATA)
> > return false;
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.1
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
> > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
> > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
> > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
2015-03-18 17:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-19 11:18 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2015-03-19 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:57 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Change log from v1:
> o add clear_buffer_new() in f2fs_map_bh
>
> This patch modifies to call set_buffer_new, if new blocks are allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
2015-03-18 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2015-03-19 11:19 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2015-03-19 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Jeageuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:58 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:12:00AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 12:58 AM
> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data
> > >
> > > This patch removes wrong f2fs_bug_on in truncate_inline_inode.
> > >
> > > When there is no space, it can happen a corner case where i_isze is over
> > > MAX_INLINE_SIZE while its inode is still inline_data.
> > >
> > > The scenario is
> > > 1. write small data into file #A.
> > > 2. fill the whole partition to 100%.
> > > 3. truncate 4096 on file #A.
> >
> > If we truncate size over MAX_INLINE_DATA, we will convert inline data in
> > f2fs_truncate rather than write_begin below. isn't it?
>
> But, it fails to convert that due to -ENOSPC. :)
That makes sense, :)
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Thank,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-19 11:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-17 16:57 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix to cover sentry_lock for block allocation Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: set buffer_new when new blocks are allocated Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-18 2:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-03-18 17:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-19 11:18 ` Chao Yu
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-17 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: avoid wrong f2fs_bug_on when truncating inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-18 1:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-03-18 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-03-19 11:19 ` Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome