From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>, mancha <mancha1@zoho.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, dborkman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:56:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426701379.2258085.242143049.7A720D00@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318174136.GD5663@thunk.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 18:41, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Maybe we should add a kernel self-test that automatically checks
> whether or not memset_explicit() gets optimized away? Otherwise we
> might not notice when gcc or how we implement barrier() or whatever
> else we end up using ends up changing.
>
> It shold be something that is really fast, so it might be a good idea
> to simply automatically run it as part of an __initcall()
> unconditionally. We can debate where the __initcall() lives, but I'd
> prefer that it be run even if the crypto layer isn't configured for
> some reason. Hopefully such an self-test is small enough that the
> kernel bloat people won't complain. :-)
>
> -Ted
Maybe a BUILD_BUGON: ;)
__label__ l1, l2;
char buffer[1024];
l1:
memset(buffer, 0, 1024);
l2:
BUILD_BUGON(&&l1 == &&l2);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 9:53 mancha
2015-03-18 10:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 10:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 10:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 11:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:02 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:14 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:19 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:20 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 15:09 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 16:02 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 17:14 ` mancha
2015-03-18 17:49 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 19:09 ` mancha
2015-03-18 23:53 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2015-03-18 17:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 17:56 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2015-03-18 17:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 12:58 ` mancha
2015-04-10 13:25 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:22 ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:33 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 20:09 ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:26 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:36 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-10 14:50 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 19:10 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 20:41 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426701379.2258085.242143049.7A720D00@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mancha1@zoho.com \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome