mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/16] scripts: Make checkpatch.pl warn on expedited RCU grace periods
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:20:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437171616-13832-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437171616-13832-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The synchronize_rcu_expedited() and synchronize_sched_expedited()
expedited-grace-period primitives induce OS jitter, which can degrade
real-time response.  This commit therefore adds a checkpatch.pl warning
on any patch adding them.

Note that this patch does not warn on synchronize_srcu_expedited()
because it does not induce OS jitter, courtesy of its otherwise
much-maligned read-side memory barriers.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 90e1edc8dd42..0658a5f3029a 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5011,6 +5011,7 @@ sub process {
 				     "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);
 			}
 		}
+
 # check for waitqueue_active without a comment.
 		if ($line =~ /\bwaitqueue_active\s*\(/) {
 			if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
@@ -5018,6 +5019,24 @@ sub process {
 				     "waitqueue_active without comment\n" . $herecurr);
 			}
 		}
+
+# Check for expedited grace periods that interrupt non-idle non-nohz
+# online CPUs.  These expedited can therefore degrade real-time response
+# if used carelessly, and should be avoided where not absolutely
+# needed.  It is always OK to use synchronize_rcu_expedited() and
+# synchronize_sched_expedited() at boot time (before real-time applications
+# start) and in error situations where real-time response is compromised in
+# any case.  Note that synchronize_srcu_expedited() does -not- interrupt
+# other CPUs, so don't warn on uses of synchronize_srcu_expedited().
+# Of course, nothing comes for free, and srcu_read_lock() and
+# srcu_read_unlock() do contain full memory barriers in payment for
+# synchronize_srcu_expedited() non-interruption properties.
+		if ($line =~ /\b(synchronize_rcu_expedited|synchronize_sched_expedited)\(/) {
+			WARN("EXPEDITED_RCU_GRACE_PERIOD",
+			     "expedited RCU grace periods should be avoided in cases where they can degrade real-time response\n" . $herecurr);
+
+		}
+
 # check of hardware specific defines
 		if ($line =~ m@^.\s*\#\s*if.*\b(__i386__|__powerpc64__|__sun__|__s390x__)\b@ && $realfile !~ m@include/asm-@) {
 			CHK("ARCH_DEFINES",
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-17 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-17 22:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/16] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.3 Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/16] rcu: Drop RCU_USER_QS in favor of NO_HZ_FULL Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/16] rcu: Deinline rcu_read_lock_sched_held() if DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/16] rcu: Change return type to bool Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/16] rcu: Add RCU-sched flavors of get-state and cond-sync Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/16] rcu: Hide RCU_NOCB_CPU behind RCU_EXPERT Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/16] rcu: Use WRITE_ONCE in RCU_INIT_POINTER Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/16] rcu: Fix obsolete priority-boosting comment Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/16] rcu: Create a synchronize_rcu_mult() Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/16] cpu: Wait for RCU grace periods concurrently Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/16] rcu: Make rcu_is_watching() really notrace Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/16] rcu: Rename rcu_lockdep_assert() to RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/16] rcu: Fix backwards RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() in synchronize_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/16] rcu: Clarify CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG help text Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/16] rcu: update MAINTAINERS entry Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-07-17 22:37     ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/16] scripts: Make checkpatch.pl warn on expedited RCU grace periods Joe Perches
2015-07-21  0:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-21  0:48         ` Joe Perches
2015-07-21  1:02           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-21  0:55       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-21  1:06         ` Joe Perches
2015-07-21  1:15           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-21 17:18             ` Joe Perches
2015-07-21 20:11               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-21  1:29           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-21  1:58             ` Joe Perches
2015-07-21  3:24               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 22:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/16] rcu: Don't disable CPU hotplug during OOM notifiers Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1437171616-13832-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®