[PATCH 2/2] Staging: Lustre: Fixed coding style issues

[PATCH 2/2] Staging: Lustre: Fixed coding style issues

[Panos Vlachos]

Fixed one coding style issue in the
file router_proc.c (Lustre staging driver)

Signed-off-by: Panos Vlachos <panosvlchs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
index 65f65a3..87afb40 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
  */
 #define LNET_PROC_CPT_BITS	(LNET_CPT_BITS + 1)
 /* change version, 16 bits or 8 bits */
-#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)
+#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	\
+max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)
 
 #define LNET_PROC_HASH_BITS	LNET_PEER_HASH_BITS
 /*
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: Lustre: Fixed coding style issues

[Drokin, Oleg]

On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Panos Vlachos wrote:

> Fixed one coding style issue in the
> file router_proc.c (Lustre staging driver)

Perhaps it's best to reference what the issue is.
I.e. "Fix too long line in …"
and then in the actual message add that you just split it?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Panos Vlachos <panosvlchs@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
> index 65f65a3..87afb40 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
>  */
> #define LNET_PROC_CPT_BITS	(LNET_CPT_BITS + 1)
> /* change version, 16 bits or 8 bits */
> -#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)
> +#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	\
> +max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)

Hm, I am not sure this is an improvement, you might want to at least place a tab at the start of this
second line, so that indentation helps us better see it's a continuation of the previous one.

Thanks.

> 
> #define LNET_PROC_HASH_BITS	LNET_PEER_HASH_BITS
> /*
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: Lustre: Fixed coding style issues

[Joe Perches]

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 21:35 +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Panos Vlachos wrote:
> > Fixed one coding style issue in the
> > file router_proc.c (Lustre staging driver)
> Perhaps it's best to reference what the issue is.
> I.e. "Fix too long line in …"
> and then in the actual message add that you just split it?
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
[]
> > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
> >  */
> > #define LNET_PROC_CPT_BITS	(LNET_CPT_BITS + 1)
> > /* change version, 16 bits or 8 bits */
> > -#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)
> > +#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	\
> > +max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8)
> Hm, I am not sure this is an improvement, you might want to at least place a tab at the start of this
> second line, so that indentation helps us better see it's a continuation of the previous one.

Given:
	#define LNET_LOFFT_BITS          (sizeof(loff_t) * 8)
and:
	include/linux/types.h:typedef __kernel_loff_t           loff_t;
	include/uapi/asm-generic/posix_types.h:typedef long long        __kernel_loff_t;

and this isn't going to change any time soon,
maybe this #define isn't particularly useful and

	#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS	16

is sufficient.