From: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid()
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 11:17:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14b678b1-822a-46c2-8bb5-913622a77cac@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605011136.2043393-7-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 6/4/2026 8:11 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> The memory allocation for the x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[] array in
> intel_pmu_init_hybrid() can theoretically fail due to memory shortages.
> If this occurs, the initialization of the x86 hybrid PMU would fail.
>
> Currently, the code does not check the return value of the
> intel_pmu_init_hybrid() function, which could lead to attempts to access
> the uninitialized x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[] array, potentially causing a
> system panic.
>
> So, adds a check for the return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() to
typo: adds -> add.
> prevent invalid memory access in such scenarios. Besides, free the
> created kmem cache when error occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index ea3ab3050a3b..efd9caa3502c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -7870,6 +7870,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> int version, i;
> char *name;
> struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu;
> + int ret;
>
> /* Architectural Perfmon was introduced starting with Core "Yonah" */
> if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON)) {
> @@ -8539,7 +8540,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> *
> * Initialize the common PerfMon capabilities here.
> */
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = grt_latency_data;
> x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = adl_get_event_constraints;
> @@ -8597,7 +8600,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> case INTEL_METEORLAKE:
> case INTEL_METEORLAKE_L:
> case INTEL_ARROWLAKE_U:
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = cmt_latency_data;
> x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = mtl_get_event_constraints;
> @@ -8628,7 +8633,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> pr_cont("Pantherlake Hybrid events, ");
> name = "pantherlake_hybrid";
>
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> /* Initialize big core specific PerfMon capabilities.*/
> pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_CORE_IDX];
> @@ -8643,7 +8650,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> pr_cont("Arrowlake Hybrid events, ");
> name = "arrowlake_hybrid";
>
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> /* Initialize big core specific PerfMon capabilities.*/
> pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_CORE_IDX];
> @@ -8660,7 +8669,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> pr_cont("Lunarlake Hybrid events, ");
> name = "lunarlake_hybrid";
>
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> /* Initialize big core specific PerfMon capabilities.*/
> pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_CORE_IDX];
> @@ -8685,7 +8696,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> break;
>
> case INTEL_ARROWLAKE_H:
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small_tiny);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small_tiny);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = arl_h_latency_data;
> x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = arl_h_get_event_constraints;
> @@ -8720,7 +8733,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> case INTEL_NOVALAKE_L:
> pr_cont("Novalake Hybrid events, ");
> name = "novalake_hybrid";
> - intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = nvl_latency_data;
> x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = mtl_get_event_constraints;
> @@ -8885,6 +8900,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> intel_aux_output_init();
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + kmem_cache_destroy(x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->task_ctx_cache);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 1:11 [PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:04 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 1:37 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:08 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:15 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix redundant branch type check in intel_pmu_lbr_filter() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 18:28 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 1:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-08 6:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix kernel address leakages in LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 16:17 ` Chen, Zide [this message]
2026-06-08 2:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 18:47 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 20:32 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-08 2:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-08 15:46 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-09 0:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 19:08 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 2:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14b678b1-822a-46c2-8bb5-913622a77cac@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox