From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
ricardo.neri@intel.com,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 22/29] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:54:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507089272-32733-23-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507089272-32733-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Tasks running in virtual-8086 mode, in protected mode with code segment
descriptors that specify 16-bit default address sizes via the
D bit, or via an address override prefix will use 16-bit addressing form
encodings as described in the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architecture Software
Developer's Manual Volume 2A Section 2.1.5, Table 2-1.
16-bit addressing encodings differ in several ways from the 32-bit/64-bit
addressing form encodings: ModRM.rm points to different registers and, in
some cases, effective addresses are indicated by the addition of the value
of two registers. Also, there is no support for SIB bytes. Thus, a
separate function is needed to parse this form of addressing.
A couple of functions are introduced. get_reg_offset_16() obtains the
offset from the base of pt_regs of the registers indicated by the ModRM
byte of the address encoding. get_addr_ref_16() computes the linear
address indicated by the instructions using the value of the registers
given by ModRM and the base address of the applicable segment.
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 182 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 182 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index d43808c..2f859a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -462,6 +462,80 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
}
/**
+ * get_reg_offset_16() - Obtain offset of register indicated by instruction
+ * @insn: Instruction containing ModRM byte
+ * @regs: Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @offs1: Offset of the first operand register
+ * @offs2: Offset of the second opeand register, if applicable
+ *
+ * Obtain the offset, in pt_regs, of the registers indicated by the ModRM byte
+ * within insn. This function is to be used with 16-bit address encodings. The
+ * offs1 and offs2 will be written with the offset of the two registers
+ * indicated by the instruction. In cases where any of the registers is not
+ * referenced by the instruction, the value will be set to -EDOM.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * 0 on success, -EINVAL on error.
+ */
+static int get_reg_offset_16(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
+ int *offs1, int *offs2)
+{
+ /*
+ * 16-bit addressing can use one or two registers. Specifics of
+ * encodings are given in Table 2-1. "16-Bit Addressing Forms with the
+ * ModR/M Byte" of the Intel Software Development Manual.
+ */
+ static const int regoff1[] = {
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bx),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bx),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bp),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bp),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, si),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, di),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bp),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, bx),
+ };
+
+ static const int regoff2[] = {
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, si),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, di),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, si),
+ offsetof(struct pt_regs, di),
+ -EDOM,
+ -EDOM,
+ -EDOM,
+ -EDOM,
+ };
+
+ if (!offs1 || !offs2)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Operand is a register, use the generic function. */
+ if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 3) {
+ *offs1 = insn_get_modrm_rm_off(insn, regs);
+ *offs2 = -EDOM;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ *offs1 = regoff1[X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value)];
+ *offs2 = regoff2[X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value)];
+
+ /*
+ * If ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 110b, then we use displacement-
+ * only addressing. This means that no registers are involved in
+ * computing the effective address. Thus, ensure that the first
+ * register offset is invalild. The second register offset is already
+ * invalid under the aforementioned conditions.
+ */
+ if ((X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 0) &&
+ (X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value) == 6))
+ *offs1 = -EDOM;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
* get_desc() - Obtain address of segment descriptor
* @sel: Segment selector
*
@@ -713,6 +787,112 @@ int insn_get_modrm_rm_off(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
/**
+ * get_addr_ref_16() - Obtain the 16-bit address referred by instruction
+ * @insn: Instruction containing ModRM byte and displacement
+ * @regs: Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ *
+ * This function is to be used with 16-bit address encodings. Obtain the memory
+ * address referred by the instruction's ModRM and displacement bytes. Also, the
+ * segment used as base is determined by either any segment override prefixes in
+ * insn or the default segment of the registers involved in the address
+ * computation. In protected mode, segment limits are enforced.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * Linear address referenced by the instruction operands on success.
+ *
+ * -1L on error.
+ */
+static void __user *get_addr_ref_16(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ unsigned long linear_addr = -1L, seg_base_addr, seg_limit;
+ int addr_offset1, addr_offset2, seg_reg_indx, ret;
+ short eff_addr, addr1 = 0, addr2 = 0;
+
+ insn_get_modrm(insn);
+ insn_get_displacement(insn);
+
+ if (insn->addr_bytes != 2)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * If operand is a register, the layout is the same as in
+ * 32-bit and 64-bit addressing.
+ */
+ if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 3) {
+ addr_offset1 = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
+ if (addr_offset1 < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset1);
+
+ seg_reg_indx = resolve_seg_reg(insn, regs, addr_offset1);
+ if (seg_reg_indx < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, seg_reg_indx);
+ if (seg_base_addr == -1L)
+ goto out;
+
+ seg_limit = get_seg_limit(regs, seg_reg_indx);
+ } else {
+ ret = get_reg_offset_16(insn, regs, &addr_offset1,
+ &addr_offset2);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't fail on invalid offset values. They might be invalid
+ * because they cannot be used for this particular value of
+ * the ModRM. Instead, use them in the computation only if
+ * they contain a valid value.
+ */
+ if (addr_offset1 != -EDOM)
+ addr1 = 0xffff & regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset1);
+ if (addr_offset2 != -EDOM)
+ addr2 = 0xffff & regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset2);
+
+ eff_addr = addr1 + addr2;
+
+ /*
+ * The first operand register could indicate to use of either SS
+ * or DS registers to obtain the segment selector. The second
+ * operand register can only indicate the use of DS. Thus, use
+ * the first operand to obtain the segment selector.
+ */
+ seg_reg_indx = resolve_seg_reg(insn, regs, addr_offset1);
+ if (seg_reg_indx < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ seg_base_addr = insn_get_seg_base(regs, seg_reg_indx);
+ if (seg_base_addr == -1L)
+ goto out;
+
+ seg_limit = get_seg_limit(regs, seg_reg_indx);
+
+ eff_addr += (insn->displacement.value & 0xffff);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Before computing the linear address, make sure the effective address
+ * is within the limits of the segment. In virtual-8086 mode, segment
+ * limits are not enforced. In such a case, the segment limit is -1L to
+ * reflect this fact.
+ */
+ if ((unsigned long)(eff_addr & 0xffff) > seg_limit)
+ goto out;
+
+ linear_addr = (unsigned long)(eff_addr & 0xffff) + seg_base_addr;
+
+ /* Limit linear address to 20 bits */
+ if (v8086_mode(regs))
+ linear_addr &= 0xfffff;
+
+out:
+ return (void __user *)linear_addr;
+}
+
+/**
* get_addr_ref_32() - Obtain a 32-bit linear address
* @insn: Instruction with ModRM, SIB bytes and displacement
* @regs: Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
@@ -1021,6 +1201,8 @@ static void __user *get_addr_ref_64(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
switch (insn->addr_bytes) {
+ case 2:
+ return get_addr_ref_16(insn, regs);
case 4:
return get_addr_ref_32(insn, regs);
case 8:
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 3:54 [PATCH v9 00/29] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 01/29] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 02/29] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0 Ricardo Neri
2017-10-26 7:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-26 9:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-26 9:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-26 12:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-27 19:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 03/29] ptrace,x86: Make user_64bit_mode() available to 32-bit builds Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 04/29] uprobes/x86: Use existing definitions for segment override prefixes Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 05/29] x86/mpx: Simplify handling of errors when computing linear addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 06/29] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-05 9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-05 17:38 ` Neri, Ricardo
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 07/29] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 08/29] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 09/29] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-eval file Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 10/29] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Ricardo Neri
2017-10-07 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-09 23:56 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 11/29] x86/insn-eval: Add a utility function to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 12/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to identify string instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 13/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-10-10 22:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 1:12 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-13 1:08 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-13 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-13 18:43 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-17 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 20:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-18 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-19 6:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 7:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 14/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 14:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 0:45 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 15/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 15:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-11 19:57 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 20:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 1:24 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 16:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 16/29] x86/insn-eval: Add function to get default params of code segment Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 16:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 18:27 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 17/29] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 15:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 18/29] x86/insn-eval: Incorporate segment base in linear address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:10 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 19/29] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:24 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 19:16 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 20/29] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 32 and 64-bit addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 21/29] x86/insn-eval: Handle 32-bit address encodings in virtual-8086 mode Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 23/29] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 24/29] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 25/29] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-10-26 7:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-27 21:46 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 26/29] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 27/29] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 28/29] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 29/29] selftests/x86: Add tests for instruction str and sldt Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507089272-32733-23-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®